ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2023
Identification and validation of a novel cuproptosis-related lncRNA signature for predicting colorectal cancer patients' survival.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- LncRNA expression signature correlated with cuproptosis: prognostic implications and insights into immune microenvironment in ovarian cancer.Journal of molecular histology · 2026Article
- AKT1 Phosphorylates FDX1 to Promote Cuproptosis Resistance in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cuproptosis is a novel form of cell death referred to as copper-dependent cytotoxicity. The regulation of proptosis is becoming an increasingly popular cancer treatment modality. To date, few studies have attempted to identify the cuproptosis-related long non-coding RNAs (CRLs). In this study, we sought to investigate the CRLs and construct a novel prognostic model for colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods: The RNA-sequencing data of CRC patients were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas database. An analysis was conducted to identify the differentially expressed long non-coding RNAs, and a correlation analysis was performed to identify the CRLs. A univariate Cox analysis was conducted to select the prognostic CRLs. Based on a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression analysis, a prognostic signature comprising the 22 identified CRLs was constructed. A survival receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was conducted to evaluate the performance of the signature. Finally, an Results: A signature comprising 22 CRLs was developed. The patients in the training and validation sets were divided into the low- and high-risk groups and had significantly different survival probabilities. This signature had outstanding prognostic accuracy in predicting the 5-year overall survival of patients [training set, area under the curve (AUC) =0.820; validation set, AUC =0.810]. The pathway enrichment analysis showed that the differential genes between low and high groups were enriched in several important oncogenic- and metastatic-associated processes and pathways. Finally, the Conclusions: Our findings provided promising insights into the CRLs involved in CRC. The signature based on CRLs has been successfully devised to prognosticate the clinical outcomes and treatment responses in patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.