Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37200969›Full record

ArticleCurrent research in food science2023

Quantitative analysis of 3D food printing layer extrusion accuracy: Contextualizing automated image analysis with human evaluations: Quantifying 3D food printing accuracy.

Yizhou Ma, Jelle Potappel, Maarten A I Schutyser, Remko M Boom, Lu Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current research in food science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. 3D-Printable Chontaduro (Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yizhou MaLaboratory of Food Process Engineering, Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box 17, 6700 AA, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Jelle PotappelLaboratory of Food Process Engineering, Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box 17, 6700 AA, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Maarten A I SchutyserLaboratory of Food Process Engineering, Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box 17, 6700 AA, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Remko M BoomLaboratory of Food Process Engineering, Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box 17, 6700 AA, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Lu ZhangLaboratory of Food Process Engineering, Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box 17, 6700 AA, Wageningen, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

3D food printing can customize food appearance, textures, and flavors to tailor to specific consumer needs. Current 3D food printing depends on trial-and-error optimization and experienced printer operators, which limits the adoption of the technology by general consumers. Digital image analysis can be applied to monitor the 3D printing process, quantify printing errors, and guide optimization of the printing process. We here propose an automated printing accuracy assessment tool based on layer-wise image analysis. Printing inaccuracies are quantified based on over- and under-extrusion with reference to the digital design. The measured defects are compared to human evaluations via an online survey to contextualize the errors and identify the most useful measurements to improve printing efficiency. The survey participants marked oozing and over-extrusion as inaccurate printing which matched the results obtained from automated image analysis. Although under-extrusion was also quantified by the more sensitive digital tool, the survey participants did not perceive consistent under-extrusion as inaccurate printing. The contextualized digital assessment tool provides useful estimations of printing accuracy and corrective actions to avoid printing defects. The digital monitoring approach may accelerate the consumer adoption of 3D food printing by improving the perceived accuracy and efficiency of customized food printing.

Indexed as

Consumer insightsDirect ink writingExtrusion-based 3D food printingProcess monitoring

Identifiers

PMID37200969
PMCPMC10186490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.