ArticleJournal of the International Society for Respiratory Protection2022
Review of the Effect of Continuous Use and Limited Reuse of N95 Respirators on Respirator Fit.
Article in Journal of the International Society for Respiratory Protection, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has led to severe shortages of filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs). As a result, extended use, limited reuse, and FFR decontamination have been utilized to extend the life of single-use FFRs. Although some studies have raised concerns that reuse could affect the FFR's ability to form a seal, no comprehensive literature review of the effect of extended use or limited reuse on FFR seal exists. Objective: The goal of this review was to assess the effect of extended use and reuse on respirator fit, with and without decontamination. Methods: Searches of PubMed and Medrxiv yielded 24 papers that included assessment of fit after extended use or limited reuse on a human. One additional handpicked paper was added. Results: Studies report a wide variation in the number of donnings and doffings before fit failure between different models of respirators. Additionally, while seal checks lack sufficient sensitivity to reliably detect fit failures, individuals who failed fit testing were often able to pass subsequent tests by re-positioning the respirator. Even with failure, respirators often maintained a substantially higher level of fit than a surgical mask, so they may still provide a level of protection in crisis settings. Conclusion: Based on currently available data, this literature review was unable to establish a consensus regarding the amount of time a respirator can be worn or the number of uses before fit failure will occur. Furthermore, variations in reuses before fit failure between different models of N95 respirators limit the ability to offer a comprehensive recommendation of greater than one reuse or a specific amount of wear time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37200947PMC10191141W4377094066What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.