ReviewGland surgery2023
Alternative donor sites in autologous breast reconstruction: a clinical practice review of the PAP flap.
Review in Gland surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- PAP Versus DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction: Current Evidence and the Unresolved Question of Timing and Oncologic Safety-A Narrative Review.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The profunda artery perforator flap in autologous breast reconstruction: a scientific review.Gland surgery · 2025Review
- Autologous Breast Reconstruction With Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Reconstruction for Poland Syndrome.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- Breast Reconstruction With Profunda-artery Perforator Flap Combined With Fat Grafting After Mastectomy of Recurrent Phyllodes Tumor.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- Enhancing Volume Precision in Breast Reconstruction: A BMI-Based Model for Predicting Flap Weight in Profunda Artery Perforator Flaps.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Assessing Donor Site Morbidity and Impact on Quality of Life in Free Flap Microsurgery: An Overview.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Advances in Microsurgical Treatment Options to Optimize Autologous Free Flap Breast Reconstruction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Optimizing the Pedicled Latissimus Dorsi Myocutaneous Flap in Breast Reconstruction: Lessons Learned from 110 Consecutive Flaps.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Breast cancer is currently the most common cancer in female patients in the United States and around the world, with over 2 million new cases of breast cancer diagnosed in 2020. Subsequently, breast reconstruction after mastectomy is also becoming increasingly common. While not every patient elects to undergo reconstruction after mastectomy, many patients desire reconstruction with either implant-based or autologous tissue. In certain patients, autologous reconstruction can offer a multitude of advantages over implant-based reconstruction. While abdominally-based free flaps such as the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap have become the flap of choice for breast reconstruction, the profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap is a strong alternative for patients in which abdominally-based flaps are contraindicated or insufficient. This clinical practice review aims to summarizes the history of the PAP flap, describe relevant anatomy and characteristics of the PAP flap that make it a well-suited option in breast reconstruction. It will also provide clinical pearls related to pre-operative preparation, markings, and surgical technique involved in ensuring successful perforator dissection, flap harvest, inset, and survival. Finally, this review will discuss current literature published on PAP flaps to determine post-operative clinical outcomes, complications, and patient reported outcomes associated with PAP flap breast reconstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.