Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37200810›Full record

ArticleACS pharmacology & translational science2023

Chronic Wound Healing Models.

Kiley Flynn, Nouf N Mahmoud, Shahriar Sharifi, Lisa J Gould, Morteza Mahmoudi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS pharmacology & translational science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Fish Collagen Hydrolysates in Wound Healing: A Patent Review.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Enhancing Transcutaneous Drug Delivery: Advanced Perspectives on Skin Models.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Kiley FlynnDepartment of Radiology and Precision Health Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824-1312, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3645-0452
Nouf N MahmoudFaculty of Pharmacy, Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan, Amman 11733, Jordan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3870-7568
Shahriar SharifiDepartment of Radiology and Precision Health Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824-1312, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3853-5428
Lisa J GouldDepartment of Surgery, South Shore Hospital, South Weymouth, Massachusetts 02190, United States.
Morteza MahmoudiDepartment of Radiology and Precision Health Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824-1312, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2575-9684
Michigan State University · USAl-Zaytoonah University of Jordan · JOSouth Shore Hospital · US

Funding

A Nanostructured Skin Patch to Heal Chronic WoundsR01DK131417 · NIDDK · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Morteza Mahmoudi · 2022 to 2026
$2.0M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK131417
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, we review and analyze the commonly available wound healing models reported in the literature and discuss their advantages and issues, considering their relevance and translational potential to humans. Our analysis includes different in vitro and in silico as well as in vivo models and experimental techniques. We further explore the new technologies in the study of wound healing to provide an all encompassing review of the most efficient ways to proceed with wound healing experiments. We revealed that there is not one model of wound healing that is superior and can give translatable results to human research. Rather, there are many different models that have specific uses for studying certain processes or stages of wound healing. Our analysis suggests that when performing an experiment to assess stages of wound healing or different therapies to enhance healing, one must consider not only the species that will be used but also the type of model and how this can best replicate the physiology or pathophysiology in humans.

Identifiers

PMID37200810
PMCPMC10186367
OpenAlexW4366449232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.