ArticleCureus2023
Testicular Radiotherapy: A Challenging Irradiation Site.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- One-year follow-up after fractionated ultra-high-dose-rate FLASH radiotherapy in patient with extramammary Paget disease of the scrotum.Precision radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Pediatric Myeloid Sarcoma of the Testes Treated With Surgery and Adjuvant Radiation Therapy.Cureus · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Testicular radiation therapy is a crucial component of the overall treatment of certain neoplasms. Yet, it remains challenging due to the unique anatomic location of the testicles, their specific radiation tolerance, and the lack of a standardized treatment workflow. In this article, we present the case of a 78-year-old patient with primary testicular lymphoma and describe the technical aspects of his radiation therapy. The challenge was to achieve a comfortable, reproducible, and effective treatment position while protecting the penis and covering the superficial layers of the scrotum. We used a total body restraint system and performed a second simulated CT scan with a bolus. The entire scrotum was delineated as the clinical target volume, with an additional 1 cm margin to obtain the planning target volume. This case highlights the importance of careful planning and personalized treatment approaches in testicular irradiation and underscores the need for further research and standardization in this complex irradiation site.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.