Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37200607›Full record

ArticleJCO oncology practice2023

Survival in Older Japanese Adults With Advanced Cancer Before and After Implementation of a Geriatric Oncology Service.

Tomohiro F Nishijima, Mototsugu Shimokawa, Masato Komoda, Fumiyasu Hanamura, Yuta Okumura, Masaru Morita, Yasushi Toh, Taito Esaki, Hyman B Muss

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in JCO oncology practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Tailoring Therapy in Older Adults With Hematologic Malignancies.American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Management of esogastric cancer in older patients.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tomohiro F NishijimaGeriatric Oncology Service, National Hospital Organization (NHO) Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3773-7762
Mototsugu ShimokawaDepartment of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8140-4565
Masato KomodaDepartment of Gastrointestinal and Medical Oncology, NHO Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan.ORCID 0009-0009-5901-323X
Fumiyasu HanamuraDepartment of Gastrointestinal and Medical Oncology, NHO Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Yuta OkumuraDepartment of Gastrointestinal and Medical Oncology, NHO Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7825-8373
Masaru MoritaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, NHO Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Yasushi TohDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, NHO Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8808-0740
Taito EsakiDepartment of Gastrointestinal and Medical Oncology, NHO Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Hyman B MussDepartment of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.ORCID 0000-0003-2862-9970
National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center · JPUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USYamaguchi University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeResearch studies have demonstrated that comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) improves outcomes in older adults with cancer treated with chemotherapy. We compared survival outcomes on older adults with advanced cancer before and after the initiation of a geriatric oncology service (GOS) in a single Japanese cancer center.

methodsThis was a comparative study of two groups of consecutive patients 70 years and older with advanced cancer who were referred to medical oncology for first-line chemotherapy before (controls; n = 151, September 2015-August 2018) and after (GOS; n = 191, September 2018-March 2021) implementation of the GOS. When the treating physician requested a consultation from the GOS, a geriatrician and an oncologist performed CGA and provided recommendations for cancer treatment and geriatric interventions. Time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS) were compared between the two groups.

resultsThe median age for all patients was 75 (range, 70-95) years, and 85% had GI cancers. In the GOS group, 82 patients received the CGA before a treatment decision and oncologic treatment plans were changed in 49 patients (60%). The overall implementation rate of the CGA-based geriatric interventions was 45%. Two hundred and eighty-two patients received chemotherapy (controls; n = 128 and GOS; n = 154), and 60 patients were treated with best supportive care only (controls; n = 23 and GOS; n = 37). Among patients receiving chemotherapy, TTF event rates for the GOS group compared with the control group were 5.7% versus 14% at 30 days (

conclusionIn this study, older adults with advanced cancer managed after the implementation of a GOS had improved survival outcomes compared with a historical control of patients.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overGeriatric AssessmentHumansJapanMedical OncologyPatient Care Planning

Identifiers

PMID37200607
OpenAlexW4377013438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.