ArticleJournal of combinatorial optimization2023
A combination of TEXTCNN model and Bayesian classifier for microblog sentiment analysis.
Article in Journal of combinatorial optimization, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2024-03-25Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Compromised Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Objections by Author(s) · Rogue Editor · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
More and more individuals are paying attention to the research on the emotional information found in micro-blog comments. TEXTCNN is growing rapidly in the short text space. However, because the training model of TEXTCNN model itself is not very extensible and interpretable, it is difficult to quantify and evaluate the relative importance of features and themselves. At the same time, word embedding can't solve the problem of polysemy at one time. This research suggests a microblog sentiment analysis method based on TEXTCNN and Bayes that addresses this flaw. First, the word embedding vector is obtained by word2vec tool, and based on the word vector, the ELMo word vector integrating contextual features and different semantic features is generated by ELMo model. Second, the local features of ELMo word vector are extracted from multiple angles by using the convolution layer and pooling layer of TEXTCNN model. Finally, the training task of emotion data classification is completed by combining Bayes classifier. On the Stanford Sentiment Classification Corpus data set SST (Stanford Sentiment Classification Corpus Data bank), the experimental findings demonstrate that the model in this paper is compared with TEXTCNN, LSTM, and LSTM-TEXTCNN models. The Accuracy, Precision, Recall, and F1-score of the experimental results of this research have all greatly increased. Their values are respectively 0.9813, 0.9821, 0.9804 and 0.9812, which are superior to other comparison models and can be effectively used for emotional accurate analysis and identification of events in microblog emotion analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.