ReviewInternational journal of immunopathology and pharmacology
Report of two sisters with Netherton syndrome successfully treated with dupilumab and review of the literature.
Review in International journal of immunopathology and pharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Primary atopic disorders: Monogenic insights into immunity.Journal of human immunity · 2026Review
- Biologics and Small-Molecule Therapies in Netherton Syndrome: A Comprehensive Review.The Journal of dermatology · 2025Review
- Secukinumab as a Novel Treatment for Chronic Netherton Syndrome in a Young Adult.The American journal of case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Different monoclonal antibodies have been used for the treatment of Netherton's syndrome (NS); secukinumab (anti-IL17A), infliximab (anti-TNF-α), ustekinumab (anti p40 subunit of IL-12 and IL-23), omalizumab (anti-IgE), and dupilumab (anti-IL4 and IL13). We report two sisters with severe NS who were treated with omalizumab in one and with secukinumab in the other. In view of the therapeutic failure, treatment with dupilumab was started in both sisters. The data were analyzed 16 weeks after starting treatment with dupilumab. Treatment response was assessed using the Severity Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD); Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI); Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NSR); Netherton Area Severity Assessment (NASA) and Dermatology Life Quality Index Ichthyosis. All scores were reduced after 16 weeks of treatment with dupilumab in both patients. She maintains improvement after 18 months and 12 months of treatment, respectively. No severe adverse events were reported. Treatment with dupilumab in two sisters with NS and atopic diseases produced a marked cutaneous improvement after a failed attempt with omalizumab and secukinumab. Further studies are needed to determine which biologic therapy is the most effective in NS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.