Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37200454›Full record

ArticleThe Australian journal of rural health2023

Lived experience of participants who engaged in the co-creation of initiatives to improve children's health in a rural Australian community.

Carmen Vargas, Monique Hillenaar, Claudia Strugnell, Steven Allender, Lucy Marks, Melanie Green, Carolina Venegas Hargous, Michelle Jackson, Colin Bell, Jillian Whelan

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Australian journal of rural health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Umbrella review of systematic reviews to inform the development and translation of community-based childhood obesity prevention interventions.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Carmen VargasSchool of Health and Social Development, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6166-8897
Monique HillenaarSchool of Health and Social Development, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Claudia StrugnellSchool of Health and Social Development, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Steven AllenderSchool of Health and Social Development, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Lucy MarksMansfield District Hospital, Mansfield, Victoria, Australia.
Melanie GreenMansfield District Hospital, Mansfield, Victoria, Australia.
Carolina Venegas HargousSchool of Medicine, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Michelle JacksonSchool of Health and Social Development, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Colin BellSchool of Medicine, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Jillian WhelanSchool of Health and Social Development, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9434-109X
Deakin University · AUMansfield University · US

Funding

Deakin UniversityNational Health and Medical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe participants' lived experience of co-creating and implementing initiatives to improve children's health.

designThis manuscript reports an embedded case study design, which aims to describe participants' lived experiences of co-creating community-based initiatives. Information was gathered from an online survey and two focus groups. The two transcribed discussions from the focus groups were analysed using a 6-step phenomenological process.

settingMansfield, Australia, population 4787, is one of ten local government areas (LGA) participating in the Reflexive Evidence and Systems Interventions to Prevent Obesity and Non-communicable Disease (RESPOND) project.

participantsParticipants were purposively selected from established community groups previously engaged by RESPOND using a co-creation approach. The recruitment for the focus groups was a convenient sampling from participants that provided their email addresses in the online survey.

resultsEleven participants completed the online survey. A total of ten participants attended the two focus groups of 1-h duration: five participants in each. Participants reported feeling empowered to create unique, locally relevant and readily adaptable community-wide change. They were supported by a strong partnership that mobilised funding for a part-time health promotion employee. Strengthened social connections were an unexpected though highly valued outcome.

conclusionCo-creation processes may assist stakeholders in delivering prevention strategies in ways that are empowering for them, responsive to the changing needs of the community, strengthen organisational partnerships and enhance community participation, social inclusion and engagement.

Indexed as

Child HealthHealth PromotionAustraliaChildCommunity ParticipationHumansObesityco-creationcommunity-ledhealthy eatingobesity preventionphysical activityrural health

Identifiers

PMID37200454
PMCPMC10946477
OpenAlexW4377046786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.