ArticlePloS one2023
Identification of some bioactive compounds from Trignonella foenumgraecum as possible inhibitors of PPARϒ for diabetes treatment through molecular docking studies, pharmacophore modelling and ADMET profiling: An in-silico study.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lipid-based nano-carriers for the delivery of anti-obesity natural compounds: advances in targeted delivery and precision therapeutics.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
- Possible GABAkine-Mediated Sedative-Like Antidepressant Effects of Phytol: Molecular Interventions Through In Vitro, In Vivo and In Silico Approaches.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2025Article
- Combined Hyaluronic Acid Nanobioconjugates Impair CD44-Signaling for Effective Treatment Against Obesity: A Review of Comparison with Other Actors.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
- Unlocking therapeutic potential of trigonelline through molecular docking as a promising approach for treating diverse neurological disorders.Metabolic brain disease · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oral antidiabetic agents including the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) agonists are available for the clinical management of diabetes mellitus (DM) but most are characterized by many adverse effects. In this study, we explore the antidiabetic properties of phytoconstituents from Trigonellafeonumgraecum (Fabaceae) as potential agonist of PPARγ; using in silico molecular docking, molecular mechanics generalized surface area (MM/GBSA)free binding energy prediction, Pharmacophore modeling experiment, and Pharmacokinetic/ toxicity analysis. One hundred and forty (140) compounds derived from Trigonellafeonumgraecum were screened by molecular docking against protein target PDB 3VI8. Results obtained from binding affinity (BA) and that of binding free energy (BFE) revealed five 5 compounds; arachidonic acid (CID_10467, BA -10.029, BFE -58.9), isoquercetin (CID_5280804, BA -9.507kcal/mol, BFE -56.33), rutin (CID_5280805, BA -9.463kcal/mol, BFE -56.33), quercetin (CID_10121947, BA -11.945kcal/mol, BFE -45.89) and (2S)-2-[[4-methoxy-3-[(pyrene-1-carbonylamino)methyl]phenyl]methyl]butanoic acid (CID_25112371, BA -10.679kcal/mol, BFE -45.73); and were superior to the standard; Rosiglitazone with a docking score of -7.672. Hydrogen bonding was notable in the protein-ligand complex interaction, with hydrophobic bond, polar bond and pipi stacking also observed. Their Pharmacokinetic/ toxicity profile showed varying druggable characteristics, but; arachidonic acid had the most favorable characteristics. These compounds are potential agonists of PPARγ and are considered as antidiabetic agents after successful experimental validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.