ArticlePloS one2023
Development of a cell-free screening assay for the identification of direct PERK activators.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The activation of the unfolded protein response, particularly via the PERK pathway, has been suggested as a promising therapeutic approach in tauopathies, a group of neurodegenerative disorders characterized by the abnormal phosphorylation and aggregation of tau protein. So far, a shortage of available direct PERK activators has been limiting the progresses in this field. Our study aimed at the development of a cell-free screening assay enabling the detection of novel direct PERK activators. By applying the catalytic domain of recombinant human PERK, we initially determined ideal conditions of the kinase assay reaction, including parameters such as optimal kinase concentration, temperature, and reaction time. Instead of using PERK's natural substrate proteins, eIF2α and NRF2, we applied SMAD3 as phosphorylation-accepting protein and successfully detected cell-free PERK activation and inhibition by selected modulators (e.g., calcineurin-B, GSK2606414). The developed assay revealed to be sufficiently stable and robust to assess an activating EC50-value. Additionally, our results suggested that PERK activation may take place independent of the active site which can be blocked by a kinase inhibitor. Finally, we confirmed the applicability of the assay by measuring PERK activation by MK-28, a recently described PERK activator. Overall, our data show that a cell-free luciferase-based assay with the recombinant human PERK kinase domain and SMAD3 as substrate protein is capable of detecting PERK activation, which enables to screen large compound libraries for direct PERK activators, in a high-throughput-based approach. These activators will be useful for deepening our understanding of the PERK signaling pathway, and may also lead to the identification of new therapeutic drug candidates for neurodegenerative tauopathies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.