ArticlePloS one2023
Association between body mass index and posterior spine fusion among patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Does an increased preoperative body mass index (BMI) affect adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery outcomes and complications? A meta-analysis.Spine deformity · 2025Pooled it
- Ageing and BMI in Focus: Rethinking Risk Assessment for Vertebral Fragility and Pedicle Screw Loosening in Older Adults.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Potential Interaction betweenBiomedicines · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPrevious studies have found mixed associations between body mass index (BMI) and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) incidence and progression. The aim of this study was to examine the association between BMI and the incidence of posterior spine fusion (PSF) among pediatric patients with AIS.
methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with AIS at a single large tertiary care center between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2020. BMI-for-age percentiles were used to categorize BMI into four categories: underweight (<5th percentile), healthy weight (≥5th to <85th percentile), overweight (≥85th to <95th percentile), and obese (≥95th percentile). Chi-square and t-tests were used to compare distributions of baseline characteristics by incident PSF outcome status. Multivariable logistic regression assessed the association between BMI category at baseline and incident PSF adjusting for sex, age at diagnosis, race/ethnicity, health insurance type, vitamin D supplementation, and low vitamin D levels.
resultsA total of 2,258 patients met the inclusion criteria with 2,113 patients (93.6%) who did not undergo PSF during the study period and 145 patients (6.4%) who did undergo PSF. At baseline, 7.3% of patients were categorized as underweight, 73.2% were healthy weight, 10.2% were overweight, and 9.3% were obese. Compared to those in the healthy weight group, there was no significant association between PSF and being underweight (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.64, 95% CI 0.90-2.99, p = 0.107), being overweight (AOR 1.25, 95% CI 0.71-2.20, p = 0.436), or being obese (AOR 1.19, 95% CI 0.63-2.27, p = 0.594).
conclusionsThis study did not find a statistically significant association between underweight, overweight, or obese BMI category and incident PSF among patients with AIS. These findings add to the current mixed evidence on the relationship between BMI and surgical risk and may support the recommendation of conservative treatment to patients regardless of BMI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.