ArticlePloS one2023
Accurate deep learning model using semi-supervised learning and Noisy Student for cervical cancer screening in low magnification images.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Application of artificial intelligence in cervical cytology: a systematic review of deep learning models, datasets, and reported metrics.Frontiers in big data · 2025Pooled it
- Integrated Deep Learning Surveillance of Unknown Pathogens with Pandemic Potential Using Pneumonia of Unknown Etiology.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence for colposcopic and cytological image analysis in early cervical cancer detection.iScience · 2026Review
- Rapid and Accurate Diagnosis of Breast Cancer by Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy Using the "Click-to-Sense" Method.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Progress in the application research of cervical cancer screening developed by artificial intelligence in large populations.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Machine and Deep Learning for the Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Treatment of Cervical Cancer: A Scoping Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Performance of artificial intelligence for diagnosing cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Reassessing deep learning (and meta-learning) computer vision as an efficient method to determine taphonomic agency in bone surface modifications.Biology methods & protocols · 2025Article
- Quantitative Structural Analysis of Hyperchromatic Crowded Cell Groups in Cervical Cytology: Overcoming Diagnostic Pitfalls.Cancers · 2024Article
- Enhancing cervical cancer cytology screening via artificial intelligence innovation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Deep learning with noisy labels in medical prediction problems: a scoping review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024Article
- Enhancing cervical cancer detection and robust classification through a fusion of deep learning models.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Towards automatic farrowing monitoring-A Noisy Student approach for improving detection performance of newborn piglets.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep learning technology has been used in the medical field to produce devices for clinical practice. Deep learning methods in cytology offer the potential to enhance cancer screening while also providing quantitative, objective, and highly reproducible testing. However, constructing high-accuracy deep learning models necessitates a significant amount of manually labeled data, which takes time. To address this issue, we used the Noisy Student Training technique to create a binary classification deep learning model for cervical cytology screening, which reduces the quantity of labeled data necessary. We used 140 whole-slide images from liquid-based cytology specimens, 50 of which were low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, 50 were high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, and 40 were negative samples. We extracted 56,996 images from the slides and then used them to train and test the model. We trained the EfficientNet using 2,600 manually labeled images to generate additional pseudo labels for the unlabeled data and then self-trained it within a student-teacher framework. Based on the presence or absence of abnormal cells, the created model was used to classify the images as normal or abnormal. The Grad-CAM approach was used to visualize the image components that contributed to the classification. The model achieved an area under the curve of 0.908, accuracy of 0.873, and F1-score of 0.833 with our test data. We also explored the optimal confidence threshold score and optimal augmentation approaches for low-magnification images. Our model efficiently classified normal and abnormal images at low magnification with high reliability, making it a promising screening tool for cervical cytology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.