Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37200247›Full record

ReviewPloS one2023

Complex interventions for aggressive challenging behaviour in adults with intellectual disability: A rapid realist review informed by multiple populations.

Rachel Royston, Stephen Naughton, Angela Hassiotis, Andrew Jahoda, Afia Ali, Umesh Chauhan, Sally-Ann Cooper, Athanasia Kouroupa, Liz Steed, Andre Strydom and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Holistic management of epilepsy in adults with intellectual development disorders.Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel RoystonDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9901-2284
Stephen NaughtonDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Angela HassiotisDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Andrew JahodaSchool of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Afia AliDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Umesh ChauhanSchool of Medicine, University of Central Lancashire, Lancashire, United Kingdom.
Sally-Ann CooperSchool of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Athanasia KouroupaDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Liz SteedWolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Andre StrydomForensic & Neurodevelopmental Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2502-6704
Laurence TaggartSchool of Nursing and Paramedic Science, Ulster University, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.
Penny RapaportDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
University College London · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GBKing's College London · GBQueen Mary University of London · GBUniversity of Lancashire · GBUniversity of Ulster · GB

Funding

Department of Health NIHR200120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesApproximately 10% of people with intellectual disability display aggressive challenging behaviour, usually due to unmet needs. There are a variety of interventions available, yet a scarcity of understanding about what mechanisms contribute to successful interventions. We explored how complex interventions for aggressive challenging behaviour work in practice and what works for whom by developing programme theories through contexts-mechanism-outcome configurations.

methodsThis review followed modified rapid realist review methodology and RAMESES-II standards. Eligible papers reported on a range of population groups (intellectual disability, mental health, dementia, young people and adults) and settings (community and inpatient) to broaden the scope and available data for review.

resultsFive databases and grey literature were searched and a total of 59 studies were included. We developed three overarching domains comprising of 11 contexts-mechanism-outcome configurations; 1. Working with the person displaying aggressive challenging behaviour, 2. Relationships and team focused approaches and 3. Sustaining and embedding facilitating factors at team and systems levels. Mechanisms underlying the successful application of interventions included improving understanding, addressing unmet need, developing positive skills, enhancing carer compassion, and boosting staff self-efficacy and motivation.

conclusionThe review emphasises how interventions for aggressive challenging behaviour should be personalised and tailored to suit individual needs. Effective communication and trusting relationships between service users, carers, professionals, and within staff teams is essential to facilitate effective intervention delivery. Carer inclusion and service level buy-in supports the attainment of desired outcomes. Implications for policy, clinical practice and future directions are discussed. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020203055.

Indexed as

Intellectual DisabilityPopulation GroupsAdolescentAdultCaregiversHumansMental HealthMotivation

Identifiers

PMID37200247
PMCPMC10194976
OpenAlexW4377046830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.