Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37200072›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2023

Offerings and User Demands of eHealth Services in Spain: National Survey.

Andrés Cernadas Ramos, Ángela Fernández Da Silva, Bran Barral Buceta, Ramón Bouzas-Lorenzo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrés Cernadas Ramos *Department of Political Science and Sociology, Faculty of Political and Social Sciences, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1189-9010
Ángela Fernández Da Silva *Department of Sociology, Political Science and Administration, and Philosophy, University of Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7915-3645
Bran Barral Buceta *Department of Political Science and Sociology, Faculty of Political and Social Sciences, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3656-0846
Ramón Bouzas-Lorenzo *Department of Political Science and Sociology, Faculty of Political and Social Sciences, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9103-8893

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe accelerated development of information and communication technologies has made health care one of the pioneering fields in the incorporation of these tools. As new technologies have been applied, existing technologies have been sophisticated and improved and the concept of eHealth has expanded. However, these advances and expansion of eHealth do not seem to have served to adapt the supply of services to users' demands; rather, supply seems to be governed by other variables.

objectiveThe main objective of this work was to review the existing differences between user demands and the supply of eHealth services in Spain and their causes. The aim is to provide information on the level of use of the services and the causes of the variation in demand for these services, which can be useful in correcting existing differences and adapting them to the needs of users.

methodsA survey, "Use and Attitudes Toward eHealth in Spain," was applied by telephone to a sample of 1695 people aged 18 years and over, taking into account sociodemographic profile characteristics (sex, age, habitat, educational level). The confidence level was set at 95% and the margin of error was ±2.45 for the whole sample.

resultsThe survey results showed that the online doctor's appointment service is the most frequently used eHealth service by users: 72.48% of respondents used this service at some point and 21.28% stated that they use it regularly. The other services showed significantly lower percentages of use, including "managing health cards" (28.04%), "consulting medical history" (20.37%), "managing test results" (20.22%), "communicating with health professionals" (17.80%), and "requesting a change of doctor" (13.76%). Despite this low usage, a large majority of respondents (80.00%) attach great importance to all the services offered. Overall, 16.52% of the users surveyed were willing to make new service requests to the regional websites, with 9.33% of them highlighting services such as "the availability of a complaints and claims mailbox," "the possibility of consulting medical records," and "the availability of more detailed information on medical centers (location, medical directory, waiting lists, etc)." Other outstanding requests (8.00%) were to simplify the procedures for using certain existing services.

conclusionsThe data from the survey show that eHealth services are widely known and highly valued by users, but not all services are used with the same frequency or intensity. It appears that users find it difficult to suggest new services that might be useful to them in terms of demand for new services that do not currently exist. It would be useful to use qualitative studies to gain a deeper understanding of currently unmet needs and the possibilities of eHealth. The lack of access to and use of these services and the unmet needs particularly affect more vulnerable populations who have the greatest difficulty in meeting their needs through alternative means to eHealth.

Indexed as

TelemedicineAdolescentAdultDelivery of Health CareHealth PersonnelHumansSpainSurveys and QuestionnairesCOVID-19digital healtheHealth demandseHealth offershealth policiesSpanish eHealth

Identifiers

PMID37200072
PMCPMC10236285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.