Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37199971›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental psychology. General2023

The role of memory in counterfactual valuation.

Natalie Biderman, Samuel J Gershman, Daphna Shohamy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental psychology. General, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Natalie BidermanDepartment of Psychology, Mortimer B. Zuckerman Mind, Brain, Behavior Institute, Columbia University.ORCID 0000-0001-6691-4188
Samuel J GershmanDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University.
Daphna ShohamyDepartment of Psychology, Mortimer B. Zuckerman Mind, Brain, Behavior Institute, Columbia University.

Funding

Differentiating reward seeking and loss avoidance with reference-dependent learning modelsR01MH121093 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI DAW, NATHANIEL DOUGLASS, SHOHAMY, DAPHNA · 2019 to 2022
$2.1M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH121093
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Value-based decisions are often guided by past experience. If a choice led to a good outcome, we are more likely to repeat it. This basic idea is well-captured by reinforcement-learning models. However, open questions remain about how we assign value to options we did not choose and which we therefore never had the chance to learn about directly. One solution to this problem is proposed by policy gradient reinforcement-learning models; these do not require direct learning of value, instead optimizing choices according to a behavioral policy. For example, a logistic policy predicts that if a chosen option was rewarded, the unchosen option would be deemed less desirable. Here, we test the relevance of these models to human behavior and explore the role of memory in this phenomenon. We hypothesize that a policy may emerge from an associative memory trace formed during deliberation between choice options. In a preregistered study (

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorDecision MakingHumansLearningReinforcement, PsychologyReward

Identifiers

PMID37199971
PMCPMC10272005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.