ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2023
A biomarker discovery of acute myocardial infarction using feature selection and machine learning.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond Conventional Blood Parameters: Novel Hematologic Indices for Interpretable Artificial Intelligence in Acute Myocardial Infarction.Journal of clinical practice and research · 2025Article
- Risk factor identification mechanism for coronary artery disease based on multiple cross-filtering and binary cuckoo search.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A systematic comparison of short-term and long-term mortality prediction in acute myocardial infarction using machine learning models.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Observational
- Machine Learning-Driven Transcriptome Analysis of Keratoconus for Predictive Biomarker Identification.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- An exploratory study of high-throughput transcriptomic analysis reveals novel mRNA biomarkers for acute myocardial infarction using integrated methods.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Clinical Response Characteristics of Salivary Proteins in the Management Strategy of Diabetes-Associated Periodontitis.Journal of proteome research · 2025Article
- Intrinsic factors behind long COVID: exploring the role of nucleocapsid protein in thrombosis.PeerJ · 2025Review
- The association between anion gap and length of stay in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery: data from the MIMIC-IV database.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
- Sixty years in service to international biomedical engineering community.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or heart attack is a significant global health threat and one of the leading causes of death. The evolution of machine learning has greatly revamped the risk stratification and death prediction of AMI. In this study, an integrated feature selection and machine learning approach was used to identify potential biomarkers for early detection and treatment of AMI. First, feature selection was conducted and evaluated before all classification tasks with machine learning. Full classification models (using all 62 features) and reduced classification models (using various feature selection methods ranging from 5 to 30 features) were built and evaluated using six machine learning classification algorithms. The results showed that the reduced models performed generally better (mean AUPRC via random forest (RF) algorithm for recursive feature elimination (RFE) method ranges from 0.8048 to 0.8260, while for random forest importance (RFI) method, it ranges from 0.8301 to 0.8505) than the full models (mean AUPRC via RF: 0.8044). The most notable finding of this study was the identification of a five-feature model that included cardiac troponin I, HDL cholesterol, HbA1c, anion gap, and albumin, which had achieved comparable results (mean AUPRC via RF: 0.8462) as to the models that containing more features. These five features were proven by the previous studies as significant risk factors for AMI or cardiovascular disease and could be used as potential biomarkers to predict the prognosis of AMI patients. From the medical point of view, fewer features for diagnosis or prognosis could reduce the cost and time of a patient as lesser clinical and pathological tests are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.