Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37199862›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2023

Adjuvant chemotherapy does not improve cancer-specific survival for pathologic stage II/III rectal adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery: evidence based on long-term survival analysis from SEER data.

Hualin Liao, Tengyu Zeng, Xianqiang Xie, Jiyang Li, Dongsheng Li, KejinYan, Fan Chen, Hongliang Zhu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hualin LiaoDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang , Jiangxi, 330006, China.
Tengyu ZengThe 908 Hospitalof the , Chinese People's Liberation Army Joint Logistic Support Force, Nanchang, 330006, China.
Xianqiang XieThe 908 Hospitalof the , Chinese People's Liberation Army Joint Logistic Support Force, Nanchang, 330006, China.
Jiyang LiThe 908 Hospitalof the , Chinese People's Liberation Army Joint Logistic Support Force, Nanchang, 330006, China.
Dongsheng LiThe 908 Hospitalof the , Chinese People's Liberation Army Joint Logistic Support Force, Nanchang, 330006, China.
KejinYanThe 908 Hospitalof the , Chinese People's Liberation Army Joint Logistic Support Force, Nanchang, 330006, China.
Fan ChenThe 908 Hospitalof the , Chinese People's Liberation Army Joint Logistic Support Force, Nanchang, 330006, China.
Hongliang ZhuThe 908 Hospitalof the , Chinese People's Liberation Army Joint Logistic Support Force, Nanchang, 330006, China. zhuhongliang908@163.com.
Chinese People's Liberation Army · CNPeople's Liberation Army 401 Hospital · CNNanchang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAdjuvant chemotherapy is controversial in rectal cancer, especially after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT). This retrospective study aims at evaluating adjuvant chemotherapy's long-term survival benefits in stage II and stage III rectal adenocarcinoma (RC).

methodsThis study obtained data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database registered between 2010 and 2015. The survival analyses used the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared by log-rank test. The factors that affect survival outcomes were analyzed by univariate and multivariate Cox regression. The propensity score matching (1:4) was used to ensure the balance of variables between different groups.

resultsThe median follow-up time for overall patients was 64 months. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates were 51.3% and 67.4% in the adjuvant chemotherapy (-) group and 73.9% and 79.6% in the adjuvant chemotherapy ( +) group (p < 0.001, p = 0.002). However, subgroup analysis showed adjuvant chemotherapy after NCRT improved the 5-year OS but not CSS rates in stage II and stage III RC (p = 0.003, p = 0.004; p = 0.29, p = 0.3). Univariate and multivariate analyses found adjuvant chemotherapy after NCRT was an independent prognosis factor of OS but not CSS (HR 0.8, 95%CI 0.7-0.92, p < 0.001; p = 0.276).

conclusionThe survival benefits from adjuvant chemotherapy were associated with the status of NCRT for pathological stage II and III RC. For patients who did not receive NCRT, adjuvant chemotherapy is needed to significantly improve long-term survival rates. However, adjuvant chemotherapy after NCRT did not significantly improve long-term CSS.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaRectal NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapyChemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantChemotherapy, AdjuvantHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesSurvival AnalysisAdjuvant chemotherapyNeoadjuvant chemoradiotherapyRectal cancerSurvival

Identifiers

PMID37199862
OpenAlexW4377011368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.