Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37199802›Full record

SynthesisGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2023

The ideal intravitreal injection setting: office, ambulatory surgery room or operating theatre? A narrative review and international survey.

Daniele Veritti, Valentina Sarao, Jay Chhablani, Anat Loewenstein, Paolo Lanzetta, Società Italiana della Retina (SIR) Study Group, Intravitreal Injection Setting Study Group (I2SG)

Abstract readSystematic ReviewReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Nonadherence to anti-VEGF intravitreal injections in patients with diabetic macular edema : The names of the authors.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Seeing the Future: A Review of Ocular Therapy.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daniele VerittiDepartment of Medicine - Ophthalmology, University of Udine, Piazzale Santa Maria Della Misericordia, 33100, Udine, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0148-5348
Valentina SaraoDepartment of Medicine - Ophthalmology, University of Udine, Piazzale Santa Maria Della Misericordia, 33100, Udine, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0041-5073
Jay ChhablaniDepartment of Ophthalmology, UPMC Eye Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1772-3558
Anat LoewensteinDivision of Ophthalmology, Tel Aviv Medical, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7706-1165
Paolo LanzettaDepartment of Medicine - Ophthalmology, University of Udine, Piazzale Santa Maria Della Misericordia, 33100, Udine, Italy. paolo.lanzetta@uniud.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3746-141X
Società Italiana della Retina (SIR) Study Group
Intravitreal Injection Setting Study Group (I2SG)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study reviews evidence and provides recommendations for the ideal setting of intravitreal injection (IVI) administration of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors.

methodsA multi-step approach was employed, including content analysis of regulations and guidelines, a systematic literature review, and an international survey assessing perioperative complications and endophthalmitis incidence in relation to injection settings. The literature review searched PubMed and Cochrane databases from 2006 to 2022, focusing on studies reporting correlations between complications and treatment settings. The survey utilized a web-based questionnaire distributed to clinical sites and the international ophthalmic community, with data managed using electronic capture tools.

resultsWe reviewed regulations and guidelines from 23 countries across five continents, finding significant variation in IVI administration settings. In most countries, IVI is primarily administered in outpatient clean rooms (96%) or offices (39%), while in others, it is restricted to ambulatory surgery rooms or hospital-based operating theatres (4%). The literature review found that endophthalmitis risk after IVI is generally low (0.01% to 0.26% per procedure), with no significant difference between office-based and operating room settings. The international survey (20 centers, 96,624 anti-VEGF injections) found low overall incidences of severe perioperative systemic adverse events and endophthalmitis, independent of injection settings.

conclusionNo significant differences in perioperative complications were observed among various settings, including operating theatres, ambulatory surgery rooms, offices, hospitals, or extra-hospital environments. Choosing the appropriate clinical setting can optimize patient management, potentially increasing effectiveness, quality, productivity, and capacity.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Surgical ProceduresAngiogenesis InhibitorsIntravitreal InjectionsOperating RoomsEndophthalmitisHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAngiogenesis InhibitorsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAmbulatory surgery roomEndophthalmitisIn-officeIntravitreal injectionOperating theatreSetting

Identifiers

PMID37199802
PMCPMC10587024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.