Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37199527›Full record

ArticleThe journal of trauma and acute care surgery2023

Comparison of hydroxocobalamin with other resuscitative fluids in volume-controlled and uncontrolled hemorrhage models in swine ( Sus-scrofa ).

R Madelaine Paredes, Maria Castaneda, Allyson A Mireles, Dylan Rodriguez, Joseph Maddry

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of trauma and acute care surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Efficacy of Treating Nifedipine-Induced Shock with Hydroxocobalamin in a Swine Model.Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

R Madelaine ParedesFrom the United States Air Force (R.M.P., D.R., J.M.), Clinical Resuscitation, Emergency Science, Triage and Toxicology (CRESTT); United States Air Force (M.C., A.A.M.), 59th Medical Wing, En route Care Research Center, Lackland AFB; Department of Emergency Medicine (J.M.), Brooke Army Military Medical Center; United States Army Institute of Surgical Research (USAISR) (J.M.), Ft Sam Houston, Texas; and F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine (J.M.), Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland.
Maria Castaneda
Allyson A Mireles
Dylan Rodriguez
Joseph Maddry
United States Air Force · USUniformed Services University of the Health Sciences · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraumatic hemorrhage is the leading cause of preventable death in military environments. Treatment with resuscitative fluids and blood components is based on availability, thus, frequently unavailable in the prehospital setting, due to lack of resources and costs. Hydroxocobalamin (HOC), increases blood pressure via nitric oxide scavenging. We evaluated HOC as a resuscitation fluid, in two swine hemorrhage models. Our objectives were to (1) evaluate whether HOC treatment following hemorrhagic shock improves hemodynamic parameters and (2) determine whether those effects are comparable to whole blood (WB) and lactated ringers (LR).

methodsYorkshire swine (S us scrofa ) (n = 72) were used in models of controlled hemorrhage (CH) (n = 36) and uncontrolled hemorrhage (UH) (n = 36). Randomized animals received treatment with 500 mL of either WB, LR, HOC (150 mg/kg), followed by a six-hour observation (n = 6 each group). Survival, hemodynamics, blood gases (ABGs) and chemistries were collected. Data reported as mean ± standard error of the mean and statistical analysis by ANOVA ( p < 0.05).

resultsBlood loss for CH was 41% ± 0.02 versus 33% ± 0.07 for UH. For CH, HOC treatment maintained higher systolic blood pressure (sBP, mm Hg) compared with WB and LR (72 ± 1.1; 60 ± 0.8; 58 ± 1.6; respectively). Heart rate (HR), cardiac output (CO), Sp o2 and vascular resistance were comparable with WB and LR. The ABG values were comparable between HOC and WB. For UH, HOC treatment maintained sBP levels comparable to WB and higher than LR (70 ± 0.9; 73 ± 0.5; 56 ± 1.2). HR, CO, Sp o2 , and systemic vascular resistance were comparable between HOC and WB. Survival, hemodynamics, blood gases were comparable between HOC and WB. No survival differences were found between cohorts.

conclusionHydroxocobalamin treatment improved hemodynamic parameters and Ca 2+ levels compared with LR and equivalent to WB, in both models. Hydroxocobalamin may be a viable alternative when WB is not available.

Indexed as

HydroxocobalaminShock, HemorrhagicAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalGasesHemodynamicsHemorrhageIsotonic SolutionsResuscitationSwineGasesHydroxocobalaminIsotonic Solutions

Identifiers

PMID37199527
PMCPMC10389457
OpenAlexW4377011761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.