ArticleNeurosurgery2023
Selective Tibial Neurotomy Outcomes for Spastic Equinovarus Foot: Patient Expectations and Functional Assessment.
Article in Neurosurgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of selective neurotomy for focal lower limb spasticity: a systematic review.Journal of rehabilitation medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Selective Tibial Neurotomy for Spastic Equinovarus Foot: Operative Technique.Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSpastic equinovarus foot (SEF) is a common dysfunctional foot posture after stroke that impairs balance and mobility. Selective tibial neurotomy (STN) is a simple but underutilized surgical option that can effectively address critical aspects of SEF and thereby provide enduring quality of life gains. There are few studies that examine both functional outcomes and patient satisfaction with this treatment option.
objectiveTo elucidate the patient goals that motivated their decision to undergo the procedure and compare subjective and objective changes in balance and functional mobility as a consequence of surgery.
methodsThirteen patients with problematic SEF who had previously failed conservative measures were treated with STN. Preoperative and postoperative (on average 6 months) assessments evaluated gait quality and functional mobility. In addition, a custom survey was conducted to investigate patient perspectives on STN intervention.
resultsThe survey showed that participants who opted for STN were dissatisfied with their previous spasticity management. The most common preoperative expectation for STN treatment was to improve walking, followed by improving balance, brace comfort, pain, and tone. Postoperatively, participants rated the improvement in their expectations and were, on average, 71 on a 100-point scale, indicating high satisfaction. The gait quality, assessed with the Gait Intervention and Assessment Tool, improved significantly between preoperative and postoperative assessment (M = -4.1, P = .01) with a higher average difference in stance of -3.3 than in swing -0.5. Improvement in both gait endurance (M = 36 m, P = .01) and self-selected gait speed (M = .12 m/s, P = .03) was statistically significant. Finally, static balance (M = 5.0, P = .03) and dynamic balance (M = 3.5, P = .02) were also significantly improved.
conclusionSTN improved gait quality and functional mobility and was associated with high satisfaction in patients with SEF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.