SynthesisCancer medicine2023
Effect of electronic health (eHealth) on quality of life in women with breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Cancer medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Digital and AI-enhanced psychosocial interventions in breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Effects of web-based interventions on quality of life among patients with breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Cancer medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Effect of electronic health (eHealth) on quality of life in women with breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Cancer medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Longitudinal changes in health-related quality of life after a breast cancer diagnosis in sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from the prospective ABC-DO cohort.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Telerehabilitation in Postoperative Breast Cancer Care: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies · 2025Review
- Review
- Digital Self-Management Intervention Paths for Early Breast Cancer Patients: Results of a Pilot Study.The breast journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWomen with breast cancer and improved survival face some specific quality of life (QOL) issues. Electronic health (eHealth) is a useful tool aiming to enhance health services. However, evidence remains controversial about the effect of eHealth on QOL in women with breast cancer. Another unstudied factor is the effect on specific QOL functional domains. Therefore, we undertook a meta-analysis about whether eHealth could improve the overall and specific functional domains of QOL in women with breast cancer.
methodsPubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched to identify appropriate randomized clinical trials from database inception to March 23, 2022. The standard mean difference (SMD) served as the effect size and the DerSimonian-Laird random effects model was constructed for meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to different participant, intervention, and assessment scale characteristics.
resultsWe initially identified 1954 articles excluding duplicates and ultimately included 13 of them involving 1448 patients. The meta-analysis revealed that the eHealth group had significantly higher QOL (SMD 0.27, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.13-0.40, p < 0.0001) than the usual care group. Additionally, although not statistically significant, eHealth tended to improve the physical (SMD 2.91, 95% CI -1.18 to 6.99, p = 0.16), cognitive (0.20 [-0.04, 0.43], p = 0.10), social (0.24 [-0.00, 0.49], p = 0.05), role (0.11 [0.10, 0.32], p = 0.32), and emotional (0.18 [0.08, 0.44], p = 0.18) domains of QOL. Overall, consistent benefits were observed in both the subgroup and pooled estimates.
conclusionseHealth is superior to usual care in women with breast cancer for improved QOL. Implications for clinical practice should be discussed based on subgroup analysis results. Further confirmation is needed for the effect of different eHealth patterns on specific domains of QOL, which would help improve specific health issues of the target population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.