ArticleClinical cardiology2023
Safety and efficacy of ablation index-guided atrial fibrillation ablation in octogenarians.
Article in Clinical cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Outcomes of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in octogenarians: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026Article
- Clinical outcomes after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in elderly patients: a meta-analysis with time-to-event data reconstruction.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026Review
- Safety and Efficacy of Pulsed Field Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Elderly Patients.Journal of arrhythmia · 2026Article
- The predictive value of combining CAAP-AF score and epicardial adipose tissue thickness for early recurrence after catheter ablation in atrial fibrillation patients.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Periprocedural Safety of Interventional Electrophysiological Procedures in Octogenarians and Nonagenarians.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2025Article
- Left atrial remodeling and voltage-guided ablation outcome in persistent atrial fibrillation patients over 75 years of age.Heart rhythm O2 · 2025Article
- A negative relationship between first-pass pulmonary vein isolation and body mass index in ablation index-guided pulmonary vein isolation.Heart rhythm O2 · 2024Article
- Article
- Safety and efficacy of ablation index-guided atrial fibrillation ablation in octogenarians.Clinical cardiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLimited data on the efficacy and safety of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation using an ablation index (AI) for octogenarians is available. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of AI-guided AF ablation between AF patients aged ≥80 years (Group 1) and <80 (Group 2). HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that AI-guided AF ablation could complete the procedure with comparable efficiency and safety in patients aged ≥80 years and <80.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 2087 AF patients undergoing their first AI-guided AF ablation in our hospital. We compared the atrial tachyarrhythmia (AT) recurrence and procedure-related complication rate between Group 1 (n = 193) and Group 2 (n = 1894).
resultsThe mean age was 83.0 (interquartile range [IQR] 81.0, 84.0) years in Group 1 and 67.0 (IQR 60.0, 72.0) in Group 2. AF type was significantly different between the two groups: Of Group 1 patients, 120 (62.2%) had paroxysmal AF, 61 (31.6%) persistent AF, and 12 (6.2%) long-standing persistent AF, while of Group 2 patients, 1016 (53.6%) paroxysmal AF, 582 (30.7%) persistent AF, and 296 (15.6%) long-standing persistent AF (p = .001). Unadjusted AT recurrence-free survival curves showed similar AT recurrence-free survival between the two groups (p = .67 by log-rank test). After the adjustment for AF type, the survival curve was similar between them (hazard ratio, 1.24; 95% CI [0.92-1.65]; p = .15, Group 1 vs. Group 2). The rate of procedure-related complications was similar between the two groups (3.1% vs. 3.0%, respectively, p = .83).
conclusionCatheter ablation guided by AI achieved similar AT recurrence and complication rates between elderly AF patients aged ≥80 years and patients <80 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.