Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37198715›Full record

ArticleAddiction science & clinical practice2023

SMART recovery for youth: a small, exploratory qualitative study examining the potential of a mutual-aid, peer support addictive behaviour change program for young people.

Alistair Lum, Despoina Damianidou, Kylie Bailey, Stephanie Cassel, Katherine Unwin, Alison Beck, Peter J Kelly, Angela Argent, Frank P Deane, Sophie Langford and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction science & clinical practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Alistair LumThe University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia. alistair.lum@newcastle.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-0647-3776
Despoina DamianidouThe University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
Kylie BaileyThe University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
Stephanie CasselThe University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
Katherine UnwinThe University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
Alison BeckUniversity of Wollongong and Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, Northfields Ave, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia.
Peter J KellyUniversity of Wollongong and Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, Northfields Ave, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia.
Angela ArgentSMART Recovery Australia, 33 Saunders St, Pyrmont, NSW, 2009, Australia.
Frank P DeaneUniversity of Wollongong and Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, Northfields Ave, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia.
Sophie LangfordHeadspace Newcastle, 582 Hunter St, Newcastle West, NSW, 2302, Australia.
Amanda L BakerThe University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
Kristen McCarterThe University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSMART (Self-Management and Recovery Training) Recovery is a mutual-aid program informed by cognitive behaviour therapy and motivational interviewing that provides support for a range of addictive behaviours. SMART Recovery has not been adapted to target young people with addictive behaviours despite the potential to overcome important barriers affecting youth engagement in other addiction programs. This study aimed to engage young people and SMART Recovery facilitators in qualitative interviews and focus groups to explore the potential of such a program and gain specific insights for its development.

methodsWe conducted qualitative interviews and a focus group with five young people (aged between 14 and 24 years) and eight key stakeholders (including seven SMART Recovery facilitators) to obtain recommendations on how best to reach, engage, and support young people with addictive behaviours in a tailored SMART Recovery program. Qualitative data was transcribed and analysed using iterative categorization.

resultsFive key themes were identified when developing and delivering youth-targeted SMART Recovery. [1] 'Discussing personal experiences to promote a shared identity' refers to the benefits of creating a forum where personal stories are used to connect with others and validate one's experiences. [2] 'Flexible and patient approach' emphasises a preference for facilitators to take a more gentle, less direct approach that allows for discussion beyond addictive behaviours. [3] 'Balancing information and skills with the space for discussion' acknowledges that youth want to connect in a variety of ways, beyond discussion of addictive behaviours, and that they wish to lead skill sharing and development. [4] 'Conveying a community for youth through language' highlighted the need to focus on connecting youth and to avoid the use of generic language to engage young people. [5] 'Group logistics and competing demands' refers to the logistical considerations of implementing a group program for youth that takes into account their competing demands and group accessibility.

conclusionThe findings point to considerations for developing youth specific mutual-aid groups, in particular a youth-targeted SMART Recovery program, such as by ensuring the conversation is youth-led and with an informal and flexible approach to guide group discussion.

Indexed as

Behavior, AddictiveCognitive Behavioral TherapyMotivational InterviewingAdolescentAdultCounselingHumansQualitative ResearchYoung AdultAddictive behavioursCBTMotivational interviewingMutual-aid groupPeer workerYouth

Identifiers

PMID37198715
PMCPMC10190011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.