Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37198684›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2023

Community perspectives on family planning service quality among users and non-users: a qualitative study from two cities in Burkina Faso.

Fiacre Bazie, Ilene S Speizer, Sarah Castle, Kindo Boukary, Amelia Maytan-Joneydi, Lisa M Calhoun, Yentema Onadja, Georges Guiella

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fiacre BazieInstitut Supérieur des Sciences de la Population (ISSP), Université Joseph Ki-Zerbo, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Ilene S SpeizerDepartment of Maternal and Child Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. ilene_speizer@unc.edu.
Sarah CastleIndependent Consultant (SRHR), London, UK.
Kindo BoukaryInstitut Supérieur des Sciences de la Population (ISSP), Université Joseph Ki-Zerbo, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Amelia Maytan-JoneydiCarolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 123 W. Franklin St., Chapel Hill, NC, 27516, USA.
Lisa M CalhounCarolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 123 W. Franklin St., Chapel Hill, NC, 27516, USA.
Yentema OnadjaInstitut Supérieur des Sciences de la Population (ISSP), Université Joseph Ki-Zerbo, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Georges GuiellaInstitut Supérieur des Sciences de la Population (ISSP), Université Joseph Ki-Zerbo, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.

Funding

Research Services CoreP2CHD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KAREN B GUZZO · 2015 to 2026
$9.6M
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation INV-009814NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD050924
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost studies that focus on quality of family planning (FP) services collect data from facilities. These studies miss the perspectives of quality from women who do not visit a facility and for whom perceived quality may be a barrier to service utilization.

methodsThis qualitative study from two cities in Burkina Faso examines perceived quality of FP services from women who were recruited at the community level to avoid potential biases based on recruiting women at facilities. Twenty focus group discussions were undertaken with varying groups of women of different ages (15-19; 20-24; 25+), marital statuses (unmarried; married), and current modern contraceptive use experiences (current non-users; current users). All focus group discussions were undertaken in the local language and transcribed and translated into French for coding and analysis.

resultsWomen discuss FP service quality in a variety of locations, depending on their age group. Perspectives on service quality for younger women are often informed by others' experiences whereas for the older women, they are formed by their own and others' experiences. Two important aspects of service delivery emerge from the discussions including interactions with providers and selected system-level aspects of service provision. Important components of provider interactions relate to (a) the initial reception from the provider, (b) the quality of counseling received, (c) stigma and bias from providers, and d) privacy and confidentiality. At the health system level, discussions revolved around (a) wait time; (b) stockouts of methods; (c) costs of services/methods; (d) the expectation for tests as part of service provision; and (e) difficulties with method removal.

conclusionsTo increase contraceptive use among women, it is crucial to address the components of service quality they identify as related to higher quality services. This means supporting providers to offer services in a more friendly and respectful manner. In addition, it is important to ensure that full information is provided to clients on what to expect during a visit to avoid false expectations that lead to poor perceived quality. These types of client-focused activities can improve perceptions of service quality and ideally support use of FP to meet women's needs.

Indexed as

ContraceptionFamily Planning ServicesAgedBurkina FasoCitiesContraceptive AgentsFemaleHumansContraceptive AgentsBurkina FasoFamily planningProvider interactionsQualitativeQuality

Identifiers

PMID37198684
PMCPMC10189908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.