Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37198674›Full record

Trial reportTrials2023

PRECYCLE: multicenter, randomized phase IV intergroup trial to evaluate the impact of eHealth-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessment on quality of life in patients with hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer treated with palbociclib and an aromatase inhibitor or palbociclib and fulvestrant.

Tom Degenhardt, Peter A Fasching, Diana Lüftner, Volkmar Müller, Christoph Thomssen, Christian Schem, Isabell Witzel, Thomas Decker, Hans Tesch, Sherko Kümmel and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyClinical Trial, Phase IV
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Exploring the lived experiences of women with metastatic breast cancer and their HRQoL questionnaire preferences: a qualitative study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 16 institutions in 2 countries.

Tom DegenhardtBreast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany.
Peter A FaschingObstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Diana LüftnerImmanuel Hospital Märkische Schweiz, Buckow, Germany.
Volkmar MüllerClinic and Polyclinic for Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany.
Christoph ThomssenGynecology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle-Saale, Germany.
Christian SchemMammazentrum, Jerusalem Hospital Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Isabell WitzelClinic and Polyclinic for Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany.
Thomas DeckerHematology/Oncology, Onkologie Ravensburg, Ravensburg, Germany.
Hans TeschHämatologisch-Onkologische Gemeinschaftspraxis, Frankfurt, Germany.
Sherko KümmelBreast Center, Clinics Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany.
Christoph UleerGemeinschaftspraxis Hildesheim, Hildesheim, Germany.
Rachel WuerstleinBreast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany.
Oliver HoffmannBreast Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Mathias WarmBreast Center, Academic Hospital Cologne-Holweide, Cologne, Germany.
Norbert MarschnerStudy Coordination, iOMEDICO AG, Freiburg, Germany.
Timo SchinkötheCANKADO Service GmbH, Kirchheim, Germany.
Ronald E KatesWest German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.
Johannes SchumacherStatistics, Palleos Healthcare Gmbh, Wiesbaden, Germany.
Burkhard OtrembaOnkologische Praxis, Oldenburg, Germany.
Matthias ZaissPraxis Interdisziplinäre Onkologie U. Hämatologie, Freiburg, Germany.
Nadia HarbeckBreast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany. nadia.harbeck@med.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9744-7372
Marcus SchmidtDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany.
PreCycle Investigators
Deutsches Archäologisches Institut, Zentrale · DEPraxis für Hämatologie und Onkologie · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEEssen University Hospital · DEIomedico (Germany) · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEKliniken Essen-Mitte · DEKrankenhaus Köln-Holweide · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEMammazentrum Hamburg · DEMartin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DEMedizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane · DERavensburg University of Cooperative Education · DEUniversität der Bundeswehr München · DEUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen · DEUniversity of Hildesheim · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEfficacy and quality of life (QoL) are key criteria for therapy selection in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). In hormone receptor positive (HR +) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2 -) MBC, addition of targeted oral agents such as everolimus or a cycline-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK 4/6) inhibitor (e.g., palbociclib, ribociclib, abemaciclib) to endocrine therapy substantially prolongs progression-free survival and in the case of a CDK 4/6i also overall survival. However, the prerequisite is adherence to therapy over the entire course of treatment. However, particularly with new oral drugs, adherence presents a challenge to disease management. In this context, factors influencing adherence include maintaining patients' satisfaction and early detection/management of side effects. New strategies for continuous support of oncological patients are needed. An eHealth-based platform can help to support therapy management and physician-patient interaction.

methodsPreCycle is a multicenter, randomized, phase IV trial in HR + HER2 - MBC. All patients (n = 960) receive the CDK 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib either in first (62.5%) or later line (37.5%) together with endocrine therapy (AI, fulvestrant) according to national guidelines. PreCycle evaluates and compares the time to deterioration (TTD) of QoL in patients supported by eHealth systems with substantially different functionality: CANKADO active vs. inform. CANKADO active is the fully functional CANKADO-based eHealth treatment support system. CANKADO inform is a CANKADO-based eHealth service with a personal login, documentation of daily drug intake, but no further functions. To evaluate QoL, the FACT-B questionnaire is completed at every visit. As little is known about relationships between behavior (e.g., adherence), genetic background, and drug efficacy, the trial includes both patient-reported outcome and biomarker screening for discovery of forecast models for adherence, symptoms, QoL, progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). DISCUSSION: The primary objective of PreCycle is to test the hypothesis of superiority for time to deterioration (TTD) in terms of DQoL = "Deterioration of quality of life" (FACT-G scale) in patients supported by an eHealth therapy management system (CANKADO active) versus in patients merely receiving eHealth-based information (CANKADO inform). EudraCT Number: 2016-004191-22.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsAromatase InhibitorsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleFulvestrantHumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPiperazinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyridinesQuality of LifeAromatase InhibitorsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFulvestrantpalbociclibPiperazinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyridinesCDK 4/6 inhibitoreHealthEndocrine therapyMetastatic breast cancerPatient-reported outcomeQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID37198674
PMCPMC10193608
OpenAlexW4377010670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.