Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37198630›Full record

ArticleTrials2023

Remote blood pressure monitoring in high risk pregnancy - study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (REMOTE CONTROL trial).

Theepika Rajkumar, Jill Freyne, Marlien Varnfield, Kenny Lawson, Kaley Butten, Renuka Shanmugalingam, Annemarie Hennessy, Angela Makris

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Theepika RajkumarSchool of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia. theepika.rajkumar@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1310-9622
Jill FreyneAustralian E-Health Research Centre, Health and Biosecurity, CSIRO, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Marlien VarnfieldAustralian E-Health Research Centre, Health and Biosecurity, CSIRO, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Kenny LawsonTranslational Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia.
Kaley ButtenAustralian E-Health Research Centre, Health and Biosecurity, CSIRO, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Renuka ShanmugalingamSchool of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia.
Annemarie HennessySchool of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia.
Angela MakrisDepartment of Renal Medicine, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW, Australia.
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AUCamden and Campbelltown Hospitals · AULiverpool Hospital · AUTranslational Research Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPregnant women at high risk for developing a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy require frequent antenatal assessments, especially of their blood pressure. This expends significant resources for both the patient and healthcare system. An alternative to in-clinic assessments is a remote blood pressure monitoring strategy, in which patients self-record their blood pressure at home using a validated blood pressure machine. This has the potential to be cost-effective, increase patient satisfaction, and reduce outpatient visits, and has had widespread uptake recently given the increased need for remote care during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. However robust evidence supporting this approach over a traditional face-to-face approach is lacking, and the impact on maternal and foetal outcomes has not yet been reported. Thus, there is an urgent need to assess the efficacy of remote monitoring in pregnant women at high risk of developing a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy.

methodsThe REMOTE CONTROL trial is a pragmatic, unblinded, randomised controlled trial, which aims to compare remote blood pressure monitoring in high-risk pregnant women with conventional face-to-face clinic monitoring, in a 1:1 allocation ratio. The study will recruit patients across 3 metropolitan Australian teaching hospitals and will evaluate the safety, cost-effectiveness, impact on healthcare utilisation and end-user satisfaction of remote blood pressure monitoring. DISCUSSION: Remote blood pressure monitoring is garnering interest worldwide and has been increasingly implemented following the COVID-19 pandemic. However, robust data regarding its safety for maternofoetal outcomes is lacking. The REMOTE CONTROL trial is amongst the first randomised controlled trials currently underway, powered to evaluate maternal and foetal outcomes. If proven to be as safe as conventional clinic monitoring, major potential benefits include reducing clinic visits, waiting times, travel costs, and improving delivery of care to vulnerable populations in rural and remote communities.

trial registrationThe trial has been prospectively registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12620001049965p, on October 11th, 2020).

Indexed as

COVID-19Pregnancy, High-RiskAustraliaBlood PressureFemaleHumansPandemicsPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicPregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBlood pressureGestational hypertensionHigh-risk pregnancyHome blood pressure monitoringHypertensive disorders of pregnancyMobile healthPreeclampsiaRandomised controlled trialRemote monitoringSelf-monitoring

Identifiers

PMID37198630
PMCPMC10189218
OpenAlexW4377011237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.