ArticleJournal of translational medicine2023
Haploidentical transplants deliver equal outcomes to matched sibling transplants: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Modified EASIX score on day 7 predicts survival and non-relapse mortality in pediatric acute leukemia undergoing haploidentical stem cell transplantation.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Graft CD8 T-cell-based risk system predicts survival in antithymocyte globulin-based myeloablative haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell transplantation.Clinical & translational immunology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The success of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant for hematological malignancies is heavily dependent on the availability of suitable donors. Haploidentical donor (HID) and matched sibling donor (MSD) are two important donor options providing faster and easier sources of stem cells, however, due to confounding factors present in most retrospective studies, the validity of comparing outcomes between these two donor types remains uncertain. We conducted a post-hoc analysis of a prospective clinical trial (trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry; #ChiCTR-OCH-12002490; registered 22 February 2012; https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=7061 ) to compare outcomes of HID versus MSD peripheral blood stem cell-derived transplants in patients with hematologic malignancies between 2015 and 2022. All HID-receiving patients had antithymocyte globulin-based conditioning. Propensity score matching was employed to minimize potential confounding factors between the two cohorts. A total of 1060 patients were initially reviewed and then 663 patients were ultimately included in the analysis after propensity score matching. The overall survival, relapse-free survival, non-relapse mortality rate and cumulative incidence of relapse were similar between HID and MSD cohorts. Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with positive measurable residual disease in first complete remission may have better overall survival with an HID transplant. The present demonstrated that haploidentical transplants can provide outcomes comparable to conventional MSD transplants, and HID should be recommended as one of the optimal donor choices for patients with positive measurable residual disease in first complete remission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.