ArticleBMC ophthalmology2023
Asymmetric presentation with a novel RP2 gene mutation in X-Linked retinitis pigmentosa: a case report.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gene Panel Analysis Reveals Overlapping Genetic Causes of Inherited Cataracts and Other Ocular Phenotypes in Bulgarian Patients.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2026Article
- Pre-Clinical and Clinical Advances in Gene Therapy of X-Linked Retinitis Pigmentosa: Hope on the Horizon.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe present the detailed multimodal imaging analysis in a case of X-linked retinitis pigmentosa (XLRP) exhibiting a markedly asymmetric presentation with a novel RP2 mutation. CASE PRESENTATION: A 25-year-old woman complained of decreased vision in the right eye as well as night blindness. Her visual acuity was 20/100 (OD) and 20/20 (OS). Fundus examination revealed bone spicule pigmentation with tessellated changes in the fundus within the posterior pole. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) showed generalized disruption of foveal microstructures in the OD. No abnormal findings were identified, but localized ellipsoid zone band losses were observed on OCT in the OS. Fundus autofluorescence revealed multiple patchy hypo-autofluorescent lesions in the OD and a tapetal-like radial reflex against a dark background in the OS. Fluorescein angiography and OCT angiography revealed diffuse mottled hyperfluorescence with reduced retinal vessel density in the OD and no evidence of vascular compromise in the OS. Goldmann perimetry demonstrated a constricted visual field, and electrophysiological assessment revealed an extinguished rod response and a severely impaired cone response in the OD. Molecular genetic tests via next-generation sequencing revealed the pathogenic variant to be a heterozygous frameshift mutation in RP2 (RP2, p.Glu269Glyfs*7), resulting in premature termination of the protein.
conclusionsRandom X-inactivation may be attributed to interocular differences in the severity of XLRP in female carriers. A novel frameshift mutation in the RP2 gene and a comprehensive phenotypic evaluation in the current study may broaden the spectrum of the disease in XLRP carriers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.