Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37198447›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2023

Favorable survival outcomes in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer sequentially treated with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor and osimertinib in a real-world setting.

Oliver Kraskowski, Jan A Stratmann, Marcel Wiesweg, Wilfried Eberhardt, Martin Metzenmacher, Kurt W Schmid, Thomas Herold, Hans-Ulrich Schildhaus, Kaid Darwiche, Clemens Aigner and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Oliver KraskowskiDepartment of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 46147, Essen, Germany.
Jan A StratmannDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hematology/Oncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Marcel WieswegDepartment of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 46147, Essen, Germany.
Wilfried EberhardtDepartment of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 46147, Essen, Germany.
Martin MetzenmacherDepartment of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 46147, Essen, Germany.
Kurt W SchmidInstitute of Pathology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Thomas HeroldInstitute of Pathology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Hans-Ulrich SchildhausInstitute of Pathology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Kaid DarwicheSection of Interventional Pneumology, Department of Pneumology, West German Cancer Center, University Medicine Essen-Ruhrlandklinik, Essen, Germany.
Clemens AignerGerman Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Martin StuschkeGerman Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Katharina LaueDepartment of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 46147, Essen, Germany.
Gregor ZaunDepartment of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 46147, Essen, Germany.
Stefan KasperDepartment of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 46147, Essen, Germany.
Jörg HenseDepartment of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 46147, Essen, Germany.
Martin Sebastian *Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology/Oncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Martin Schuler *Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 46147, Essen, Germany.
Michael PogorzelskiDepartment of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 46147, Essen, Germany. michael.pogorzelski@uk-essen.de.
Essen University Hospital · DEDeutschen Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung · DEWest German Heart and Vascular Center Essen · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DERuhrlandklinik · DEUniversity Hospital Frankfurt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy in EGFR-mutated lung cancer is limited by acquired resistance. In half of the patients treated with first/second-generation (1st/2nd gen) TKI, resistance is associated with EGFR p.T790M mutation. Sequential treatment with osimertinib is highly active in such patients. Currently, there is no approved targeted second-line option for patients receiving first-line osimertinib, which thus may not be the best choice for all patients. The present study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of a sequential TKI treatment with 1st/2nd gen TKI, followed by osimertinib in a real-world setting.

methodsPatients with EGFR-mutated lung cancer treated at two major comprehensive cancer centers were retrospectively analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and log rank test.

resultsA cohort of 150 patients, of which 133 received first-line treatment with a first/second gen EGFR TKI, and 17 received first-line osimertinib, was included. Median age was 63.9 years, 55% had ECOG performance score of ≥ 1. First-line osimertinib was associated with prolonged progression-free survival (P = 0.038). Since the approval of osimertinib (February 2016), 91 patients were under treatment with a 1st/2nd gen TKI. Median overall survival (OS) of this cohort was 39.3 months. At data cutoff, 87% had progressed. Of those, 92% underwent new biomarker analyses, revealing EGFR p.T790M in 51%. Overall, 91% of progressing patients received second-line therapy, which was osimertinib in 46%. Median OS with sequenced osimertinib was 50 months. Median OS of patients with p.T790M-negative progression was 23.4 months.

conclusionReal-world survival outcomes of patients with EGFR-mutated lung cancer may be superior with a sequenced TKI strategy. Predictors of p.T790M-associated resistance are needed to personalize first-line treatment decisions.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsAcrylamidesAniline CompoundsErbB ReceptorsHumansIndolesMiddle AgedMutationProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrimidinesRetrospective StudiesTyrosine Kinase InhibitorsAcrylamidesAniline CompoundsEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsIndolesosimertinibProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrimidinesTyrosine Kinase InhibitorsEGFR-mutated NSCLCEGFR T790M mutationOsimertinibRebiopsySecond lineSequential therapy

Identifiers

PMID37198447
PMCPMC10374675
OpenAlexW4376866171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.