Accuracy of radiographic techniques in detection of the calcaneofibular ligament calcaneal insertion for lateral ankle ligament complex surgery.

backgroundGrade III ankle sprains that fail conservative treatment can require surgical management. Anatomic procedures have been shown to properly restore joint mechanics, and precise localization of insertion sites of the lateral ankle complex ligaments can be determined through radiographic techniques. Ideally, radiographic techniques that are easily reproducible intraoperatively will lead to a consistently well-placed CFL reconstruction in lateral ankle ligament surgery. PURPOSE: To determine the most accurate method to locate the calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) insertion radiographically.

methodsMRIs of 25 ankles were utilized to identify the "true" insertion of the CFL. Distances between the true insertion and three bony landmarks were measured. Three proposed methods (Best, Lopes, and Taser) for determining the CFL insertion were applied to lateral ankle radiographs. X and Y coordinate distances were measured from the insertion found on each proposed method to the three bony landmarks: the most superior point of the postero-superior surface of the calcaneus, the posterior most aspect of the sinus tarsi, and the distal tip of the fibula. X and Y distances were compared to the true insertion found on MRI. All measurements were made using a picture archiving and communication system. The average, standard deviation, minimum, and maximum were obtained. Statistical analysis was performed using repeated measures ANOVA, and a post hoc analysis was performed with the Bonferroni test.

resultsThe Best and Taser techniques were found to be closest to the true CFL insertion when combining X and Y distances. For distance in the X direction, there was no significant difference between techniques (P = 0.264). For distance in the Y direction, there was a significant difference between techniques (P = 0.015). For distance in the combined XY direction, there was a significant difference between techniques (P = 0.001). The CFL insertion as determined by the Best method was significantly closer to the true insertion compared to the Lopes method in the Y (P = 0.042) and XY (P = 0.004) directions. The CFL insertion as determined by the Taser method was significantly closer to the true insertion compared to the Lopes method in the XY direction (P = 0.017). There was no significant difference between the Best and Taser methods.

conclusionIf the Best and Taser techniques can be readily used in the operating room, they would likely prove the most reliable for finding the true CFL insertion.