ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2023
Evaluation of immunodominant peptides of in vivo expressed mycobacterial antigens in an ELISA-based diagnostic assay for pulmonary tuberculosis.
Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Non-sputum-based biomarker assay is urgently required as per WHO's target product pipeline for diagnosis of tuberculosis. Therefore, the current study was designed to evaluate the utility of previously identified proteins, encoded by in vivo expressed mycobacterial transcripts in pulmonary tuberculosis, as diagnostic targets for a serodiagnostic assay. A total of 300 subjects were recruited including smear+, smear- pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) patients, sarcoidosis patients, lung cancer patients and healthy controls. Proteins encoded by eight in vivo expressed transcripts selected from previous study including those encoded by two topmost expressed and six RD transcripts (Rv0986, Rv0971, Rv1965, Rv1971, Rv2351c, Rv2657c, Rv2674, Rv3121) were analyzed for B-cell epitopes by peptide arrays/bioinformatics. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to evaluate the antibody response against the selected peptides in sera from PTB and controls. Overall 12 peptides were selected for serodiagnosis. All the peptides were initially screened for their antibody response. The peptide with highest sensitivity and specificity was further assessed for its serodiagnostic ability in all the study subjects. The mean absorbance values for antibody response to selected peptide were significantly higher (p<0.001) in PTB patients as compared to healthy controls; however, the sensitivity for diagnosis of PTB was 31% for smear+ and 20% for smear- PTB patients. Thus, the peptides encoded by in vivo expressed transcripts elicited a significant antibody response, but are not suitable candidates for serodiagnosis of PTB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.