ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2023
Assessment of the ability of the radiological incudo-stapedial angle to predict the stapedotomy technique type: a prospective case-series study.
Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessment of the Oval Window-Facial Canal Corridor and Mastoid Pneumatization: A Preliminary HRCT-Based Radiological-Anatomical Framework.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Post-stapedotomy dizziness after applying topical steroid on footplate: A randomized controlled trial.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to propose a radiological classification of the incudo-stapedial angle by preoperative high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) images and to highlight its importance for predicting the use of reversal-steps stapedotomy (RSS) rather than the traditional non-reversal technique.
methodsWe included 83 candidates for stapedotomy operation. Two physicians measured the radiological incudo-stapedial joint angle in the preoperative HRCT. According to this measurement, the radiological incudo-stapedial joint was classified into three types: obtuse, right, and acute. In addition, this radiological classification was correlated with the intraoperative use of the stapedotomy technique, either reversal or non-reversal.
resultsThe RSS technique was used in forty-two (97.7%) cases with an obtuse angle and twenty-six (89.7%) with a right angle. At the same time, the traditional non-reversal technique was used in all patients with an acute angle. The three groups differed significantly regarding the method used for stapedotomy (P value < 0.001). Moreover, Spearman's correlation coefficient revealed a significant correlation between the used technique and the radiological type of the incudo-stapedial angle (P value < 0.001).
conclusionsThis prospective study proposed a preoperative radiological classification of the incudo-stapedial angle. This classification was significantly correlated with the type of stapedotomy technique. The RSS technique was feasible in most cases with an obtuse and right radiological incudo-stapedial angle. In contrast, the non-reversal method was used in all patients with an acute radiological incudo-stapedial angle. This radiological classification could predict the choice for the stapedotomy technique with an accuracy of 95.18%, a sensitivity of 73.33%, and a specificity of 100%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.