Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37198188›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

Distinct genomic routes underlie transitions to specialised symbiotic lifestyles in deep-sea annelid worms.

Giacomo Moggioli, Balig Panossian, Yanan Sun, Daniel Thiel, Francisco M Martín-Zamora, Martin Tran, Alexander M Clifford, Shana K Goffredi, Nadezhda Rimskaya-Korsakova, Gáspár Jékely and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Why sequence the genome of every species? A view from evolutionary biology.Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Giacomo MoggioliSchool of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, E1 4NS, London, UK.
Balig PanossianSchool of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, E1 4NS, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1654-7740
Yanan SunDepartment of Ocean Science, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China.
Daniel ThielLiving Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Francisco M Martín-ZamoraSchool of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, E1 4NS, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2558-3762
Martin TranSchool of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, E1 4NS, London, UK.
Alexander M CliffordScripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.
Shana K GoffrediDepartment of Biology, Occidental College, Los Angeles, LA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9110-9591
Nadezhda Rimskaya-KorsakovaFriedrich Schiller University Jena, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Institute of Zoology and Evolutionary Research, Erbertstr. 1, 07743, Jena, Germany.
Gáspár JékelyLiving Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8496-9836
Martin TresguerresScripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7090-9266
Pei-Yuan QianDepartment of Ocean Science, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4074-9078
Jian-Wen QiuDepartment of Biology, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1541-9627
Greg W RouseScripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9036-9263
Lee M HenrySchool of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, E1 4NS, London, UK. l.henry@qmul.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-5706-1328
José M Martín-DuránSchool of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, E1 4NS, London, UK. chema.martin@qmul.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2572-1061

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust (Wellcome) 213981/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial symbioses allow annelids to colonise extreme ecological niches, such as hydrothermal vents and whale falls. Yet, the genetic principles sustaining these symbioses remain unclear. Here, we show that different genomic adaptations underpin the symbioses of phylogenetically related annelids with distinct nutritional strategies. Genome compaction and extensive gene losses distinguish the heterotrophic symbiosis of the bone-eating worm Osedax frankpressi from the chemoautotrophic symbiosis of deep-sea Vestimentifera. Osedax's endosymbionts complement many of the host's metabolic deficiencies, including the loss of pathways to recycle nitrogen and synthesise some amino acids. Osedax's endosymbionts possess the glyoxylate cycle, which could allow more efficient catabolism of bone-derived nutrients and the production of carbohydrates from fatty acids. Unlike in most Vestimentifera, innate immunity genes are reduced in O. frankpressi, which, however, has an expansion of matrix metalloproteases to digest collagen. Our study supports that distinct nutritional interactions influence host genome evolution differently in highly specialised symbioses.

Indexed as

AnnelidaPolychaetaAnimalsGenomeGenomicsPhylogenySymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID37198188
PMCPMC10192322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.