Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37198145›Full record

ReviewChemistryOpen2023

Social Media for Chemistry Scholars.

Rosaria Ciriminna, Antonino Scurria, Mario Pagliaro

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ChemistryOpen, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rosaria CiriminnaIstituto per lo Studio dei Materiali Nanostrutturati, CNR, via U. La Malfa 153, 90146, Palermo, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6596-1572
Antonino ScurriaAMAP SpA, Impianto Depurazione Acqua Dei Corsari, via Messina Marine 821, 90121, Palermo, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5624-6833
Mario PagliaroIstituto per lo Studio dei Materiali Nanostrutturati, CNR, via U. La Malfa 153, 90146, Palermo, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5096-329X
Institute of Nanostructured Materials · ITRegione Siciliana · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Used by nearly 60 % of the world's population, social media are highly interactive websites ("platforms") today widely used also by researchers. This perspective aims at identifying the main benefits of social media utilization by chemistry scholars with respect to the three main dimensions (research, education and societal service) of scholarly activity. The main risks arising from the use of social media, as we suggest in the conclusions, must be managed and new education on their purposeful utilization should be planned and delivered.

Indexed as

academic social networkscommunication of chemistryopen sciencepublic engagementsocial media

Identifiers

PMID37198145
PMCPMC10191864
OpenAlexW4376866200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.