ReviewBlood reviews2023
Relapse after allogeneic transplantation with post-transplant cyclophosphamide: Shattering myths and evolving insight.
Review in Blood reviews, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and 2 Gy TBI with PT-Cy as a single platform for haplo and unrelated donor allo-SCT in older AML or MDS patients.Bone marrow transplantation · 2026Article
- Posttransplant cyclophosphamide in HLA-matched peripheral blood transplantation: what's next?Blood · 2026Review
- Impact of graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis strategies on GvHD-free/relapse-free survival in young adults undergoing unrelated donor allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation: A propensity score-matched analysis.British journal of haematology · 2026Article
- Redefining GVHD Prophylaxis: The Expanding Horizon of Posttransplant Cyclophosphamide.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Article
- Review
- Graft-versus-tumor effect of post-transplant cyclophosphamide-based allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Janus kinase inhibition in the treatment and prevention of graft-versus-host disease.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Early studies in allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation (alloBMT) demonstrated that HLA-mismatching was protective again relapse. However, benefits in relapse reduction were outweighed by a high risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) when using conventional pharmacological immunosuppression. Post-transplant cyclophosphamide(PTCy)-based platforms abated the risk of GVHD thereby overcoming the negative effects of HLA-mismatching on survival. However, since its inception, PTCy has been shadowed by a reputation for a greater risk of relapse when compared with traditional GVHD prophylaxis. Specifically, whether PTCy reduces the anti-tumor efficacy of HLA-mismatched alloBMT by killing alloreactive T cells has been the subject of debate since the early 2000's. Here we review the many studies demonstrating the potent graft-versus-malignancy (GVM) properties of alloBMT with PTCy. We discuss the laboratory data from PTCy platforms supporting that T regulatory cells may be a major mechanism of prevention of GVHD and that natural killer (NK) cells may be early effectors of GVM. Finally, we propose potential paths to optimize GVM through selecting for class II mismatching and augmenting NK cell activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.