Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37198053›Full record

SynthesisBreast (Edinburgh, Scotland)2023

The role of CDK4/6 inhibitors in older and younger patients with breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Fausto Petrelli, Lorenzo Dottorini, Giandomenico Di Menna, Karen Borgonovo, Maria Chiara Parati, Carmen Giusy Rea, Mara Ghilardi, Antonio Ghidini, Andrea Luciani

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Fausto PetrelliOncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, BG, Italy. Electronic address: faupe@libero.it.
Lorenzo DottoriniOncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, BG, Italy.
Giandomenico Di MennaIRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per Lo Studio Dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy.
Karen BorgonovoOncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, BG, Italy.
Maria Chiara ParatiOncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, BG, Italy.
Carmen Giusy ReaOncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, BG, Italy.
Mara GhilardiOncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, BG, Italy.
Antonio GhidiniOncology Unit, Casa di Cura Igea, Milano, Italy.
Andrea LucianiOncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, BG, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliera Treviglio · ITCasa di Cura Columbus · ITIstituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors have an extremely important impact on the treatment of hormone-sensitive breast cancer (BC) and have radically changed the first-line treatment for metastatic disease with increased rates of treatment response, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS). We performed a pooled analysis of randomized trials to validate or refute the hypothesis that there is a significant survival benefit of adding anti-CDK4/6 inhibitors to standard endocrine therapy (ET) in older patients with advanced BC.

methodsWe selected only English-language phase II/III randomized controlled trials that compared ET alone with ET with anti-CDK4/6 inhibitors in the treatment of advanced BC, with subgroups reporting the outcomes of elderly patients (usually at least 65 years). The primary endpoint was OS.

resultsThe review process led to the inclusion of 12 articles and two meeting abstracts, including a total of 10 trials. The addition of CDK4/6 inhibitors to ET (letrozole or fulvestrant) significantly reduced mortality risk by 20% in younger patients (fixed-effect model; HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.72-0.9; p < 0.01) and 21% in older BC patients (HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.69-0.91; p < 0.01). No OS data were available for patients ≥70 years.

conclusionThis large, pooled analysis is the first to demonstrate that CDK4/6 inhibitors confer OS and PFS benefits in elderly patients (those aged ≥65 years) with advanced ER + BC and to indicate that it should be discussed with and offered to all patients after geriatric assessment and according to the toxicity profile.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6Erb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleFulvestrantHumansProtein Kinase InhibitorsCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6Erb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFulvestrantProtein Kinase InhibitorsBreast cancerCDK4/6 inhibitorsElderlyMeta-analysisMetastatic disease

Identifiers

PMID37198053
PMCPMC10512091
OpenAlexW4376503937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.