Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37198029›Full record

SynthesisBritish journal of anaesthesia2023

Postoperative ulnar neuropathy: a systematic review of evidence with narrative synthesis.

David W Hewson, Thomas Kurien, Jonathan G Hardman

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in British journal of anaesthesia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David W HewsonDepartment of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK; Academic Unit of Injury, Recovery and Inflammation Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. Electronic address: david.hewson@nottingham.ac.uk.
Thomas KurienAcademic Unit of Injury, Recovery and Inflammation Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK; Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Jonathan G HardmanDepartment of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK; Academic Unit of Injury, Recovery and Inflammation Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostoperative ulnar neuropathy (PUN) is an injury manifesting in the sensory or motor distribution of the ulnar nerve after anaesthesia or surgery. The condition frequently features in cases of alleged clinical negligence by anaesthetists. We performed a systematic review and applied narrative synthesis with the aim of summarising current understanding of the condition and deriving implications for practice and research.

methodsElectronic databases were searched up to October 2022 for primary research, secondary research, or opinion pieces defining PUN and describing its incidence, predisposing factors, mechanism of injury, clinical presentation, diagnosis, management, and prevention.

resultsWe included 83 articles in the thematic analysis. PUN occurs after approximately 1 in 14 733 anaesthetics. Men aged 50-75 yr with pre-existing ulnar neuropathy are at highest risk. Preventative measures, based on consensus and expert opinion, are summarised, and an algorithm of suspected PUN management is proposed, based upon the identified literature.

conclusionsPostoperative ulnar neuropathy is rare and the incidence is probably decreasing over time with general improvements in perioperative care. Recommendations to reduce the risk of postoperative ulnar neuropathy are based on low-quality evidence but include anatomically neutral arm positioning and padding intraoperatively. In selected high-risk patients, further documentation of repositioning, intermittent checks, and neurological examination in the recovery room can be helpful.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaUlnar NeuropathiesHumansIncidenceMalePostoperative PeriodUlnar Nerveanaesthesiapatient positioningpatient safetyperipheral nerve injuryulnar nerveulnar nerve compression syndromes

Identifiers

PMID37198029
PMCPMC10308442
OpenAlexW4376602310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.