Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37198019›Full record

ReviewVaccine2023

Assessing vaccine safety during a pandemic: Recent experience and lessons learned for the future.

Steven B Black, Rebecca E Chandler, Kathryn M Edwards, Miriam C J M Sturkenboom

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Nuvaxovid NVX-CoV2373 vaccine safety profile: real-world data evidence after 100,000 doses, Australia, 2022 to 2023.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2024
    Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Steven B BlackGlobal Vaccine Data Network, Auckland, New Zealand. Electronic address: stevblack@gmail.com.
Rebecca E ChandlerCoalition of Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, London, UK. Electronic address: Rebecca.chandler@cepi.net.
Kathryn M EdwardsSarah H. Sell and Cornelius Vanderbilt Professor of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, United States. Electronic address: Kathryn.edwards@vumc.org.
Miriam C J M SturkenboomDepartment of Datascience & Biostatistics, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the roll out of vaccines during a pandemic, questions regarding vaccine safety often arise. This was surely true during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Different tools and capabilities exist during the pre-authorization phase and post introduction each with its strengths and limitations. Here we review the various tools and their strengths and limitations and discuss what functioned well in high income settings and the limitations that unequal vaccine safety pharmacovigilance capacity imposed upon middle and low income countries.

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinesHumansPandemicsPharmacovigilanceSARS-CoV-2VaccinesLow income countriesPandemicPharmacovigilanceVaccine policyVaccine safety

Identifiers

PMID37198019
PMCPMC10184950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.