Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37197979›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2023

Metamodal Coupling of Vibrotactile and Auditory Speech Processing Systems through Matched Stimulus Representations.

Srikanth R Damera, Patrick S Malone, Benson W Stevens, Richard Klein, Silvio P Eberhardt, Edward T Auer, Lynne E Bernstein, Maximilian Riesenhuber

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Evidence for a Spoken Word Lexicon in the Auditory Ventral Stream.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Srikanth R DameraDepartment of Neuroscience, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007.ORCID 0000-0002-4164-5812
Patrick S MaloneDepartment of Neuroscience, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007.ORCID 0000-0002-1920-5933
Benson W StevensDepartment of Neuroscience, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007.
Richard KleinDepartment of Neuroscience, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007.
Silvio P EberhardtDepartment of Speech Language & Hearing Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052.
Edward T AuerDepartment of Speech Language & Hearing Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052.
Lynne E BernsteinDepartment of Speech Language & Hearing Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052.
Maximilian RiesenhuberDepartment of Neuroscience, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007 mr287@georgetown.edu.
Georgetown University · USGeorge Washington University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been postulated that the brain is organized by "metamodal," sensory-independent cortical modules capable of performing tasks (e.g., word recognition) in both "standard" and novel sensory modalities. Still, this theory has primarily been tested in sensory-deprived individuals, with mixed evidence in neurotypical subjects, thereby limiting its support as a general principle of brain organization. Critically, current theories of metamodal processing do not specify requirements for successful metamodal processing at the level of neural representations. Specification at this level may be particularly important in neurotypical individuals, where novel sensory modalities must interface with existing representations for the standard sense. Here we hypothesized that effective metamodal engagement of a cortical area requires congruence between stimulus representations in the standard and novel sensory modalities in that region. To test this, we first used fMRI to identify bilateral auditory speech representations. We then trained 20 human participants (12 female) to recognize vibrotactile versions of auditory words using one of two auditory-to-vibrotactile algorithms. The vocoded algorithm attempted to match the encoding scheme of auditory speech while the token-based algorithm did not. Crucially, using fMRI, we found that only in the vocoded group did trained-vibrotactile stimuli recruit speech representations in the superior temporal gyrus and lead to increased coupling between them and somatosensory areas. Our results advance our understanding of brain organization by providing new insight into unlocking the metamodal potential of the brain, thereby benefitting the design of novel sensory substitution devices that aim to tap into existing processing streams in the brain.

Indexed as

Auditory CortexSpeech PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAuditory PerceptionBrainFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingSpeechTemporal Lobeauditorycross-modalfMRImetamodalsensory-substitutionvibrotactile

Identifiers

PMID37197979
PMCPMC10324991
OpenAlexW4376867323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.