Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37197816›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Efficacy of focal high-dose-rate brachytherapy in the treatment of patients diagnosed with low or favourable: intermediate-risk prostate cancer-a protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Justinas Jonušas, Ausvydas Patasius, Mantas Trakymas, Jonas Venius, Ernestas Janulionis, Giedre Smailyte, Marius Kincius

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Justinas JonušasClinic of Hematology and Oncology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania justinas.jonusas@nvi.lt.ORCID 0000-0002-6457-4383
Ausvydas PatasiusLaboratory of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Institute, Vilnius, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0003-3874-2723
Mantas TrakymasDepartment of Radiology, National Cancer Institute, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Jonas VeniusMedical Physics Department, National Cancer Institute, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Ernestas JanulionisDepartment of Brachytherapy, National Cancer Institute, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Giedre SmailyteLaboratory of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Institute, Vilnius, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0001-8365-543X
Marius KinciusDepartment of Oncourology, National Cancer Institute, Vilnius, Lithuania.
National Cancer Institute · LTVilnius University · LT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionProstate cancer (PCa) is men's second most predominant cancer worldwide. Because the prostate-specific antigen test is used in diagnostics, PCa is more often diagnosed in the early stages, making radical treatment of the disease possible. However, it is estimated that over a million men worldwide suffer from radical treatment-related complications. Thus, focal treatment has been proposed as a solution, which aims to destroy the predominant lesson that determines the progression of the disease. The main objective of our study is to compare the quality of life and efficacy of patients diagnosed with PCa before and after the treatment with focal high-dose-rate brachytherapy and to compare results with focal low-dose-rate brachytherapy and active surveillance. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: 150 patients diagnosed with low-risk or favourable intermediate-risk PCa who meet the inclusion criteria will be enrolled in the study. Patients are going to be randomly assigned to the study groups: focal high-dose-rate brachytherapy (group 1), focal low-dose-rate brachytherapy (group 2) and active surveillance (group 3). The study's primary outcomes are quality of life after the procedure and time without biochemical disease recurrence. The secondary outcomes are early and late genitourinary and gastrointestinal reactions after the focal high-dose and low-dose-rate brachytherapies and evaluation of the importance and significance of in vivo dosimetry used for high-dose-rate brachytherapy. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Bioethics committee approval was obtained before this study. The trial results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and at conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Vilnius regional bioethics committee; approval ID 2022/6-1438-911.

Indexed as

BrachytherapyProstatic NeoplasmsHumansMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProstate-Specific AntigenQuality of LifeRadiotherapy DosageRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicProstate-Specific AntigenONCOLOGYProstate diseaseProtocols & guidelinesQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID37197816
PMCPMC10193050
OpenAlexW4377010804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.