Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37197796›Full record

ReviewBMJ global health2023

Insights from a qualitative study of the procurement and manufacture of active pharmaceutical ingredients in India.

Heather Hamill, Kate Hampshire, Harshada Vinaya, Pavan Mamidi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ global health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Heather HamillDepartment of Sociology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK heather.hamill@sociology.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-0301-7057
Kate HampshireDepartment of Anthropology, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Harshada VinayaDepartment of Cognitive Science, University of California, La Jolla, San Diego, USA.
Pavan MamidiCentre for Social and Behavioural Change, Ashoka University, Delhi, India.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/T022132/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 110084/Z/15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medicine supply systems are a crucial part of health systems and access to effective essential medicines is a key pillar of Universal Health Coverage. However, efforts to expand access are compromised by the proliferation of substandard and falsified medicines. The vast majority of research to date on medicine supply chains has focused on the formulation and distribution of the finished product, overlooking the crucial steps of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient production that precede this. In this paper, we draw on qualitative interviews with manufacturers and regulators in India to take a 'deep dive' into these understudied parts of medicine supply chains.

Indexed as

Counterfeit DrugsPharmacyHumansIndiaQualitative ResearchUniversal Health InsuranceCounterfeit DrugsHealth economicsHealth policyHealth systemsQualitative study

Identifiers

PMID37197796
PMCPMC10201222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.