Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37197741›Full record

ArticleBiometrika2023

Sample-constrained partial identification with application to selection bias.

Matthew J Tudball, Rachael A Hughes, Kate Tilling, Jack Bowden, Qingyuan Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrika, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matthew J TudballMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Oakfield Grove, Bristol, BS8 2BN, U.K.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7897-6180
Rachael A HughesMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Oakfield Grove, Bristol, BS8 2BN, U.K.
Kate TillingMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Oakfield Grove, Bristol, BS8 2BN, U.K.
Jack BowdenCollege of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, U.K.
Qingyuan ZhaoDepartment of Pure Mathematics and Mathematical Statistics, University of Cambridge, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge CB3 0WB, U.K.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_17228Medical Research Council MC_QA137853
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many partial identification problems can be characterized by the optimal value of a function over a set where both the function and set need to be estimated by empirical data. Despite some progress for convex problems, statistical inference in this general setting remains to be developed. To address this, we derive an asymptotically valid confidence interval for the optimal value through an appropriate relaxation of the estimated set. We then apply this general result to the problem of selection bias in population-based cohort studies. We show that existing sensitivity analyses, which are often conservative and difficult to implement, can be formulated in our framework and made significantly more informative via auxiliary information on the population. We conduct a simulation study to evaluate the finite sample performance of our inference procedure, and conclude with a substantive motivating example on the causal effect of education on income in the highly selected UK Biobank cohort. We demonstrate that our method can produce informative bounds using plausible population-level auxiliary constraints. We implement this method in the [Formula: see text] package [Formula: see text].

Indexed as

Auxiliary informationConstraintPartial identificationSelection biasSensitivity analysisa

Identifiers

PMID37197741
PMCPMC10183833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.