Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37197707›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2023

Intraarrest transport, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and early invasive management in refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: an individual patient data pooled analysis of two randomised trials.

Jan Belohlavek, Demetris Yannopoulos, Jana Smalcova, Daniel Rob, Jason Bartos, Michal Huptych, Petra Kavalkova, Rajat Kalra, Brian Grunau, Fabio Silvio Taccone and 1 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
24.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01511666 naterminatednot on this map

Hyperinvasive Approach to out-of Hospital Cardiac Arrest Using Mechanical Chest Compression Device, Prehospital Intraarrest Cooling, Extracorporeal Life Support and Early Invasive Assessment Compared to Standard of Care. A Randomized Parallel Groups Comparative Study. "Prague OHCA Study"

TypeinterventionalSponsorCharles University, Czech RepublicRan2013 to 2020Enrolled256ConditionsOut-of Hospital Cardiac ArrestArmsPrehospital mechanical compressions, intraarrest cooling and in hospital ECLS, Standard care
NCT03880565 naterminatednot on this map

Advanced REperfusion STrategies for Refractory Cardiac Arrest (The ARREST Trial)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MinnesotaRan2019 to 2020Enrolled30ConditionsCardiac Arrest, Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Complication, Ventricular Fibrillation, Pulseless Ventricular TachycardiaArmsEarly Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) Facilitated Resuscitation, Standard Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) Resuscitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Immediate post-ECPR management strategies in the prehospital and critical care transport medicine environments.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Jan Belohlavek2 Department of Medicine - Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, General University Hospital and 1 Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic.
Demetris YannopoulosCenter for Resuscitation Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Jana Smalcova2 Department of Medicine - Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, General University Hospital and 1 Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic.
Daniel Rob2 Department of Medicine - Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, General University Hospital and 1 Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic.
Jason BartosCenter for Resuscitation Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Michal HuptychCzech Institute of Informatics, Robotics and Cybernetics (CIIRC), Czech Technical University in Prague, Czech Republic.
Petra Kavalkova2 Department of Medicine - Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, General University Hospital and 1 Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic.
Rajat KalraCenter for Resuscitation Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Brian GrunauDepartment of Emergency Medicine, St Paul's Hospital, and University of British Columbia, 1081 Burrard St, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Fabio Silvio TacconeDepartment of Intensive Care, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Route de Lennik 808, Brussels 1070, Belgium.
Tom P AufderheideDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Charles University · CZUniversity of Minnesota Medical Center · USCzech Technical University in Prague · CZMedical College of Wisconsin · USUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BEUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) treated with standard advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) has poor outcomes. Transport to hospital followed by in-hospital extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) initiation may improve outcomes. We performed a pooled individual patient data analysis of two randomised controlled trials evaluating ECPR based approach in OHCA. Methods: The individual patient data from two published randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were pooled: ARREST (enrolled Aug 2019-June 2020; NCT03880565) and PRAGUE-OHCA (enrolled March 1, 2013-Oct 25, 2020; NCT01511666). Both trials enrolled patients with refractory OHCA and compared: intra-arrest transport with in-hospital ECPR initiation (invasive approach) versus continued standard ACLS. The primary outcome was 180-day survival with favourable neurological outcome (defined as Cerebral Performance Category 1-2). Secondary outcomes included: cumulative survival at 180 days, 30-day favourable neurological survival, and 30-day cardiac recovery. Risk of bias in each trial was assessed by two independent reviewers using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Heterogeneity was assessed via Forest plots. Findings: The two RCTs included 286 patients. Of those randomised to the invasive (n = 147) and standard (n = 139) groups, respectively: the median age was 57 (IQR 47-65) and 58 years (IQR 48-66), and the median duration of resuscitation was 58 (IQR 43-69) and 49 (IQR 33-71) minutes (p = 0.17). In a modified intention to treat analysis, 45 (32.4%) in the invasive and 29 (19.7%) patients in the standard arm survived to 180 days with a favourable neurological outcome [absolute difference (AD), 95% CI: 12.7%, 2.6-22.7%, p = 0.015]. Forty-seven (33.8%) and 33 (22.4%) patients survived to 180 days [HR 0.59 (0.43-0.81); log rank test p = 0.0009]. At 30 days, 44 (31.7%) and 24 (16.3%) patients had favourable neurological outcome (AD 15.4%, 5.6-25.1%, p = 0.003), 60 (43.2%), and 46 (31.3%) patients had cardiac recovery (AD: 11.9%, 0.7-23%, p = 0.05), in the invasive and standard arms, respectively. The effect was larger in patients presenting with shockable rhythms (AD 18.8%, 7.6-29.4; p = 0.01; HR 2.26 [1.23-4.15]; p = 0.009) and prolonged CPR (>45 min; HR 3.99 (1.54-10.35); p = 0.005). Interpretation: In patients with refractory OHCA, the invasive approach significantly improved 30- and 180-day neurologically favourable survival. Funding: None.

Indexed as

Cardiac arrestExtracorporeal circulationInvasiveResuscitation

Identifiers

PMID37197707
PMCPMC10184044
OpenAlexW4377011900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.