ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2023
Contrast- and noise-dependent spatial resolution measurement for deep convolutional neural network-based noise reduction in CT using patient data.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Detectability of Iodine in Mediastinal Lesions on Photon Counting CT: A Phantom Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Image quality evaluation in deep-learning-based CT noise reduction using virtual imaging trial methods: Contrast-dependent spatial resolution.Medical physics · 2024Article
- Evaluation of data uncertainty for deep-learning-based CT noise reduction using ensemble patient data and a virtual imaging trial framework.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2024Article
- Dependence of Resolution Properties on Display Field-of-view Size in Deep Learning-based Reconstruction Computed Tomography Images for Peripheral Vascular Imaging.Journal of medical physicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep convolutional neural network (DCNN)-based noise reduction methods have been increasingly deployed in clinical CT. Accurate assessment of their spatial resolution properties is required. Spatial resolution is typically measured on physical phantoms, which may not represent the true performance of DCNN in patients as it is typically trained and tested with patient images and the generalizability of DNN to physical phantoms is questionable. In this work, we proposed a patient-data-based framework to measure the spatial resolution of DCNN methods, which involves lesion- and noise-insertion in projection domain, lesion ensemble averaging, and modulation transfer function measurement using an oversampled edge spread function from the cylindrical lesion signal. The impact of varying lesion contrast, dose levels, and CNN denoising strengths were investigated for a ResNet-based DCNN model trained using patient images. The spatial resolution degradation of DCNN reconstructions becomes more severe as the contrast or radiation dose decreased, or DCNN denoising strength increased. The measured 50%/10% MTF spatial frequencies of DCNN with highest denoising strength were (-500 HU:0.36/0.72 mm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.