ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2023
Development of a cuproptosis-related signature for prognosis prediction in lung adenocarcinoma based on WGCNA.
Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrating bulk, single-cell, and spatial transcriptomics to identify and functionally validate novel targets to enhance immunotherapy in NSCLC.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Cuproptosis-related ceRNA axis triggers cell proliferation and cell cycle through CBX2 in lung adenocarcinoma.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2024Article
- A cuproptosis score model and prognostic score model can evaluate clinical characteristics and immune microenvironment in NSCLC.Cancer cell international · 2024Article
- Identification of important modules and biomarkers in tuberculosis based on WGCNA.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cuproptosis is a novel mitochondrial respiration-dependent cell death mechanism induced by copper that can kill cancer cells via copper carriers in cancer therapy. However, the clinical significance and prognostic value of cuproptosis in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) remains unclear. Methods: We performed a comprehensive bioinformatics analysis of the cuproptosis gene set, including copy number aberration, single-nucleotide variation, clinical characteristics, survival analysis, etc. Cuproptosis-related gene set enrichment scores (cuproptosis Z-scores) were calculated in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-LUAD cohort using single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA). Modules significantly associated with cuproptosis Z-scores were screened by weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA). The hub genes of the module were then further screened by survival analysis and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) analysis, in which TCGA-LUAD (497 samples) and GSE72094 (442 samples) were used as the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Finally, we analyzed the tumor characteristics, immune cell infiltration levels, and potential therapeutic agents. Results: Missense mutation and copy number variant (CNV) events were general in the cuproptosis gene set. We identified 32 modules, of which the MEpurple (107 genes) and MEpink (131 genes) modules significantly positively and negatively correlated with cuproptosis Z-scores, respectively. We identified 35 hub genes significantly related to overall survival and constructed a prognostic model consisting of 7 cuproptosis-related genes in patients with LUAD. Compared with the low-risk group, patients in the high-risk group had a worse overall survival and gene mutation frequency, as well as significantly higher tumor purity. In addition, infiltration of immune cells was also significantly different between the 2 groups. Furthermore, the correlation between the risk scores and half-maximum inhibitory concentration (IC50) of antitumor drugs in the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) v. 2 database was explored, revealing differences in drug sensitivity across the 2 risk groups. Conclusions: Our study provided a valid prognostic risk model for LUAD and improved understanding of its heterogeneity, which may aid in the development of personalized treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.