Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37197616›Full record

ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2023

Efficacy of different therapies for brain metastases of non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mo Chen, Lingyun Wei, Qin Wang, Jingyuan Xie, Ke Xu, Tangfeng Lv, Yong Song, Ping Zhan

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mo Chen *Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Lingyun Wei *Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Qin Wang *Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Jingyuan XieDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Ke XuDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Tangfeng LvDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Yong SongDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Ping ZhanDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command · CNNanjing University · CNJinling Institute of Technology · CNNanjing Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: As one of the most common causes of death in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), brain metastases (BM) have attracted attention and debate about treatment options, especially for patients with negative driver genes or resistance to targeted agents. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the potential benefit of different therapeutic regimens for intracranial lesions in non-targeted therapy NSCLC patients. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in databases including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. The primary endpoints included the intracerebral objective response rate (icORR) and intracerebral progression-free survival (iPFS) in patients with BM. Results: Thirty-six studies involving 1,774 NSCLC patients with baseline BM were included in this meta-analysis. Antitumor agents plus radiotherapy (RT) showed the most significant synergistic effects; the highest pooled icORR that appeared in the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) and RT was 81% [95% confidence interval (CI): 16-100%], and the median iPFS was 7.04 months (95% CI: 2.54-11.55 months). The pooled icORR and median iPFS of RT plus chemotherapy were 46% (95% CI: 34-57%) and 5.7 months (95% CI: 3.90-7.50 months), respectively. The highest median iPFS in nivolumab plus ipilimumab plus chemotherapy was 13.5 months (95% CI: 8.35-18.65 months). ICI plus chemotherapy also showed potent antitumor activity in BM, with a pooled icORR of 56% (95% CI: 29-82%) and a median iPFS of 6.9 months (95% CI: 3.20-10.60 months). Notably, the subgroup analysis indicated that the pooled icORR of patients in programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) (≥50%) who received ICI was 54% (95% CI: 30-77%), and that of patients who received first-line ICI was 69.0% (95% CI: 51-85%). Conclusions: ICI-based combination treatment provides a long-term survival benefit for non-targeted therapy patients, with the most significant benefits observed in improving icORR and prolonging overall survival (OS) and iPFS. In particular, patients who received first-line treatment or who were PD-L1-positive had a more significant survival benefit from aggressive ICI-based therapies. For patients with a PD-L1-negative status, chemotherapy plus RT led to better clinical outcomes than other treatment regimens. These innovative findings could help clinicians to better select therapeutic strategies for NSCLC patients with BM.

Indexed as

antitumor agentsbrain metastasis (BM)immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)meta‑analysisNon-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Identifiers

PMID37197616
PMCPMC10183403
OpenAlexW4328003547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.