Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37197579›Full record

ReviewBiology methods & protocols2023

UCP-LF and other assay methods for schistosome circulating anodic antigen between 1978 and 2022.

Ilemobayo Victor Fasogbon, Patrick Maduabuchi Aja, Erick Nyakundi Ondari, Ismail Adebayo, Olukayode Adebola Ibitoye, Moses Egesa, Deusdedit Tusubira, Swamiappan Sasikumar, Hope Onohuean

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biology methods & protocols, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ilemobayo Victor FasogbonDepartment of Biochemistry, Kampala International University-Western Campus, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4362-9004
Patrick Maduabuchi AjaDepartment of Biochemistry, Kampala International University-Western Campus, Kampala, Uganda.
Erick Nyakundi OndariDepartment of Biochemistry, Kampala International University-Western Campus, Kampala, Uganda.
Ismail AdebayoDepartment of Microbiology, Kampala International University-Western Campus, Kampala, Uganda.
Olukayode Adebola IbitoyeDepartment of Microbiology, Kampala International University-Western Campus, Kampala, Uganda.
Moses EgesaMRC/UVRI & LSHTM Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda.
Deusdedit TusubiraDepartment of Biochemistry, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
Swamiappan SasikumarDepartment of Chemistry, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India.
Hope OnohueanDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Biopharmaceutics Unit, Kampala International University-Western Campus, Kampala, Uganda.
Kampala International University · UGMbarara University of Science and Technology · UGUganda Virus Research Institute · UGVellore Institute of Technology University · IN

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00027/5Medical Research Council MR/K019708/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detection of circulating anodic antigen (CAA) is known for its high sensitivity in diagnosing schistosomiasis infection, even in low-prevalence settings. The Up-Converting Phosphor-Lateral Flow (UCP-LF) assay developed in 2008 presented greater sensitivity than other assay methods in use for CAA detection. Our study aims to comprehensively review all studies conducted in this area and thus generate informed conclusions on the potential for adopting the UCP-LF assay for diagnosing this important yet neglected tropical disease. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, we generated search criteria to capture all studies in English journals available in the Scopus and PubMed databases on 20 December 2022. A total of 219 articles were identified, and 84 that met the inclusion criteria were retrieved and eventually included in the study. Twelve different assay methods were identified with a noteworthy transition from enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to the UCP-LF assay, a laboratory-based assay that may be applicable as a point-of-care (POC) diagnostic test for schistosomiasis. Reducing the time, cost, and dependence on specialized laboratory skills and equipment, especially relating to the trichloroacetic acid extraction step and centrifugation in the UCP-LF CAA assay may go a long way to aid its potential as a POC tool. We also propose the development of a CAA-specific aptamer (short protein/antigen-binding oligonucleotide) as a possible alternative to monoclonal antibodies in the assay. UCP-LF has great potential for POC application.

Indexed as

assay-methodscirculating-anodic-antigenreviewschistosomiasisUCP-LF

Identifiers

PMID37197579
PMCPMC10185406
OpenAlexW4362582962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.