ArticleJournal of cancer & allied specialties2022
Post-operative Use of Abdominal Binders: Bound to Tradition?
Article in Journal of cancer & allied specialties, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Abdominal binders versus semi-rigid corsets after open ventral hernia repair: early postoperative tolerance and patient preference in a randomized cross-over study.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Trial
- Mechanical behavior of elastic abdominal binders and semi-rigid corsets under patient-applied forces and physiologically relevant loading.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Observational
- Non-Operative Considerations in Relation to Parastomal Hernia.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: An abdominal binder is an elastic or non-elastic belt applied to the abdomen in post-operative patients with abdominal surgery. These provide support and splintage to the operative wound, reducing incision site pain. The present work aims to investigate the institutional practices regarding the use of abdominal binders, gain insight into the expected benefits that these practices are targeted to achieve, and determine if current practices are in accordance with the available evidence. Materials and Methods: It is a survey-based questionnaire study conducted at the Department of Surgical Oncology at Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre. Respondents were inquired about designation, frequency of binder usage, reasons for prescribing/not prescribing binders, duration of the prescription, clinical factors that influence the decision to use binders and the estimated cost of the device. Results: The questionnaire was emailed to 85 surgeons working in the department of surgical oncology. Out of these, 34 responded, resulting in an overall response rate of 40%. Twenty-two (64.7%) of the respondents used abdominal binders regularly in post-operative patients. Eight (22.5%) reported using it occasionally, while 4 (11.7%) did not use abdominal binders in their clinical practice. About 67.8% and 50% of the respondents believed that it helped early mobilisation and better pain control, respectively. About 60.7% of the respondents believed that binders prevent incisional hernia formation, while 46.4% were of the view that these prevented wound dehiscence. Up to 60% of the respondents reported using an abdominal binder for 1 week-1 month after discharge, whereas 23.3% preferred using it only till discharge. Conclusion: This survey demonstrates a gap between the evidence and actual practice. These gaps are often overlooked because of busy clinical practice. Equally important is the issue of surgical conservatism and the intrinsic desire to resist change by continuing old practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.